History log of /openbsd/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/bfd/elf64-alpha.c (Results 1 – 12 of 12)
Revision Date Author Comments
# 2d6de53b 22-Dec-2014 kettenis <kettenis@openbsd.org>

Teach ld(1) not to add a PT_INTERP entry for -static -pie.

ok kurt@


# d2eac858 17-Dec-2013 kettenis <kettenis@openbsd.org>

Backport the code from binutils 2.16 that makes weak undefined references
work on alpha.

tested by naddy@, deraadt@


# 007c2a45 02-Nov-2004 miod <miod@openbsd.org>

Merge conflicts, bringing our changes back in:
- extra $(SHELL) and sugar for make (so that files not mode +x still work)
- safer temp file handling
- our W^X binary layout changes in ld
- OpenBSD po

Merge conflicts, bringing our changes back in:
- extra $(SHELL) and sugar for make (so that files not mode +x still work)
- safer temp file handling
- our W^X binary layout changes in ld
- OpenBSD policy for library file selection in ld
- arm and m88k changes which were not merged in time for official 2.15
- bfd core file handling
- a couple typos

New for 2.15:
- ld(1) and as(1) manpages now generated at build time
- binutils/stabs.c reverted to use our in-tree libiberty for now
- we still use our VIA C3 crypto code over stock binutils, as it recognizes
more instructions
- new emulations for OpenBSD on mips64 machines, to help OpenBSD/sgi
- relaxed %f# handling in gas on OpenBSD/sparc64 (same as was in 2.14)

Tested on all platforms by various people; special thanks to sturm@ and
otto@.

show more ...


# c074d1c9 17-May-2004 drahn <drahn@openbsd.org>

Resolve merge conflicts, adjust method of W^X handing (.sh files)
remove testsuites (not useable) remove mmalloc (not part of new binutils).


# b55d4692 13-May-2002 fgsch <fgsch@openbsd.org>

resolve conflicts.


# 6978ef19 09-Jun-2001 espie <espie@openbsd.org>

Automatic cvs merge. Dread what I will have to fix after this excuse
of a program is done...


# 034b4bc6 07-Mar-2001 niklas <niklas@openbsd.org>

Revert my bfd change, and instead make ld match bfd, which is
the way Red hat choose. Both ways work, the important thing is that
things match. However if we use the red hat solution we will not ne

Revert my bfd change, and instead make ld match bfd, which is
the way Red hat choose. Both ways work, the important thing is that
things match. However if we use the red hat solution we will not need
to merge local changes when importing new binutils releases; espie made
me aware of the import issues which I forgot due to lack of sleep :-).

show more ...


# b83e8469 07-Mar-2001 niklas <niklas@openbsd.org>

1st bug on the road to shlibs on alpha:
match the maxpagesize between bfd and ld.


# f7cc78ec 12-Sep-2000 espie <espie@openbsd.org>

Import binutils-2.10
- only the binutils package (no gdb here)
- don't import libiberty and texinfo, they are elsewhere
- remove all .info* generated files


# fddef416 29-May-1997 niklas <niklas@openbsd.org>

Import of binutils-2.8.1 from Cygnus/FSF


# 70bcd334 19-Nov-1996 niklas <niklas@openbsd.org>

Import of 961112 Cygnus binutils+gas+ld+gdb+gprof


# 4361b62e 04-Sep-1996 niklas <niklas@openbsd.org>

Import of binutils, gas, ld & gprof from Cygnus 960904 tree