1@c markers: BUG TODO
2
3@c Copyright (C) 1988-2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
4@c This is part of the GCC manual.
5@c For copying conditions, see the file gcc.texi.
6
7@node Passes
8@chapter Passes and Files of the Compiler
9@cindex passes and files of the compiler
10@cindex files and passes of the compiler
11@cindex compiler passes and files
12@cindex pass dumps
13
14This chapter is dedicated to giving an overview of the optimization and
15code generation passes of the compiler.  In the process, it describes
16some of the language front end interface, though this description is no
17where near complete.
18
19@menu
20* Parsing pass::         The language front end turns text into bits.
21* Cilk Plus Transformation:: Transform Cilk Plus Code to equivalent C/C++.
22* Gimplification pass::  The bits are turned into something we can optimize.
23* Pass manager::         Sequencing the optimization passes.
24* Tree SSA passes::      Optimizations on a high-level representation.
25* RTL passes::           Optimizations on a low-level representation.
26* Optimization info::    Dumping optimization information from passes.
27@end menu
28
29@node Parsing pass
30@section Parsing pass
31@cindex GENERIC
32@findex lang_hooks.parse_file
33The language front end is invoked only once, via
34@code{lang_hooks.parse_file}, to parse the entire input.  The language
35front end may use any intermediate language representation deemed
36appropriate.  The C front end uses GENERIC trees (@pxref{GENERIC}), plus
37a double handful of language specific tree codes defined in
38@file{c-common.def}.  The Fortran front end uses a completely different
39private representation.
40
41@cindex GIMPLE
42@cindex gimplification
43@cindex gimplifier
44@cindex language-independent intermediate representation
45@cindex intermediate representation lowering
46@cindex lowering, language-dependent intermediate representation
47At some point the front end must translate the representation used in the
48front end to a representation understood by the language-independent
49portions of the compiler.  Current practice takes one of two forms.
50The C front end manually invokes the gimplifier (@pxref{GIMPLE}) on each function,
51and uses the gimplifier callbacks to convert the language-specific tree
52nodes directly to GIMPLE before passing the function off to be compiled.
53The Fortran front end converts from a private representation to GENERIC,
54which is later lowered to GIMPLE when the function is compiled.  Which
55route to choose probably depends on how well GENERIC (plus extensions)
56can be made to match up with the source language and necessary parsing
57data structures.
58
59BUG: Gimplification must occur before nested function lowering,
60and nested function lowering must be done by the front end before
61passing the data off to cgraph.
62
63TODO: Cgraph should control nested function lowering.  It would
64only be invoked when it is certain that the outer-most function
65is used.
66
67TODO: Cgraph needs a gimplify_function callback.  It should be
68invoked when (1) it is certain that the function is used, (2)
69warning flags specified by the user require some amount of
70compilation in order to honor, (3) the language indicates that
71semantic analysis is not complete until gimplification occurs.
72Hum@dots{} this sounds overly complicated.  Perhaps we should just
73have the front end gimplify always; in most cases it's only one
74function call.
75
76The front end needs to pass all function definitions and top level
77declarations off to the middle-end so that they can be compiled and
78emitted to the object file.  For a simple procedural language, it is
79usually most convenient to do this as each top level declaration or
80definition is seen.  There is also a distinction to be made between
81generating functional code and generating complete debug information.
82The only thing that is absolutely required for functional code is that
83function and data @emph{definitions} be passed to the middle-end.  For
84complete debug information, function, data and type declarations
85should all be passed as well.
86
87@findex rest_of_decl_compilation
88@findex rest_of_type_compilation
89@findex cgraph_finalize_function
90In any case, the front end needs each complete top-level function or
91data declaration, and each data definition should be passed to
92@code{rest_of_decl_compilation}.  Each complete type definition should
93be passed to @code{rest_of_type_compilation}.  Each function definition
94should be passed to @code{cgraph_finalize_function}.
95
96TODO: I know rest_of_compilation currently has all sorts of
97RTL generation semantics.  I plan to move all code generation
98bits (both Tree and RTL) to compile_function.  Should we hide
99cgraph from the front ends and move back to rest_of_compilation
100as the official interface?  Possibly we should rename all three
101interfaces such that the names match in some meaningful way and
102that is more descriptive than "rest_of".
103
104The middle-end will, at its option, emit the function and data
105definitions immediately or queue them for later processing.
106
107@node Cilk Plus Transformation
108@section Cilk Plus Transformation
109@cindex CILK_PLUS
110
111If Cilk Plus generation (flag @option{-fcilkplus}) is enabled, all the Cilk
112Plus code is transformed into equivalent C and C++ functions.  Majority of this
113transformation occurs toward the end of the parsing and right before the
114gimplification pass.
115
116These are the major components to the Cilk Plus language extension:
117@itemize @bullet
118@item Array Notations:
119During parsing phase, all the array notation specific information is stored in
120@code{ARRAY_NOTATION_REF} tree using the function
121@code{c_parser_array_notation}.  During the end of parsing, we check the entire
122function to see if there are any array notation specific code (using the
123function @code{contains_array_notation_expr}).  If this function returns
124true, then we expand them using either @code{expand_array_notation_exprs} or
125@code{build_array_notation_expr}.  For the cases where array notations are
126inside conditions, they are transformed using the function
127@code{fix_conditional_array_notations}.  The C language-specific routines are
128located in @file{c/c-array-notation.c} and the equivalent C++ routines are in
129the file @file{cp/cp-array-notation.c}.  Common routines such as functions to
130initialize built-in functions are stored in @file{array-notation-common.c}.
131
132@item Cilk keywords:
133@itemize @bullet
134@item @code{_Cilk_spawn}:
135The @code{_Cilk_spawn} keyword is parsed and the function it contains is marked
136as a spawning function.  The spawning function is called the spawner.  At
137the end of the parsing phase, appropriate built-in functions are
138added to the spawner that are defined in the Cilk runtime.  The appropriate
139locations of these functions, and the internal structures are detailed in
140@code{cilk_init_builtins} in the file @file{cilk-common.c}.  The pointers to
141Cilk functions and fields of internal structures are described
142in @file{cilk.h}.  The built-in functions are described in
143@file{cilk-builtins.def}.
144
145During gimplification, a new "spawn-helper" function is created.
146The spawned function is replaced with a spawn helper function in the spawner.
147The spawned function-call is moved into the spawn helper.  The main function
148that does these transformations is @code{gimplify_cilk_spawn} in
149@file{c-family/cilk.c}.  In the spawn-helper, the gimplification function
150@code{gimplify_call_expr}, inserts a function call @code{__cilkrts_detach}.
151This function is expanded by @code{builtin_expand_cilk_detach} located in
152@file{c-family/cilk.c}.
153
154@item @code{_Cilk_sync}:
155@code{_Cilk_sync} is parsed like a keyword.  During gimplification,
156the function @code{gimplify_cilk_sync} in @file{c-family/cilk.c}, will replace
157this keyword with a set of functions that are stored in the Cilk runtime.
158One of the internal functions inserted during gimplification,
159@code{__cilkrts_pop_frame} must be expanded by the compiler and is
160done by @code{builtin_expand_cilk_pop_frame} in @file{cilk-common.c}.
161
162@end itemize
163@end itemize
164
165Documentation about Cilk Plus and language specification is provided under the
166"Learn" section in @w{@uref{http://www.cilkplus.org/}}.  It is worth mentioning
167that the current implementation follows ABI 1.1.
168
169@node Gimplification pass
170@section Gimplification pass
171
172@cindex gimplification
173@cindex GIMPLE
174@dfn{Gimplification} is a whimsical term for the process of converting
175the intermediate representation of a function into the GIMPLE language
176(@pxref{GIMPLE}).  The term stuck, and so words like ``gimplification'',
177``gimplify'', ``gimplifier'' and the like are sprinkled throughout this
178section of code.
179
180While a front end may certainly choose to generate GIMPLE directly if
181it chooses, this can be a moderately complex process unless the
182intermediate language used by the front end is already fairly simple.
183Usually it is easier to generate GENERIC trees plus extensions
184and let the language-independent gimplifier do most of the work.
185
186@findex gimplify_function_tree
187@findex gimplify_expr
188@findex lang_hooks.gimplify_expr
189The main entry point to this pass is @code{gimplify_function_tree}
190located in @file{gimplify.c}.  From here we process the entire
191function gimplifying each statement in turn.  The main workhorse
192for this pass is @code{gimplify_expr}.  Approximately everything
193passes through here at least once, and it is from here that we
194invoke the @code{lang_hooks.gimplify_expr} callback.
195
196The callback should examine the expression in question and return
197@code{GS_UNHANDLED} if the expression is not a language specific
198construct that requires attention.  Otherwise it should alter the
199expression in some way to such that forward progress is made toward
200producing valid GIMPLE@.  If the callback is certain that the
201transformation is complete and the expression is valid GIMPLE, it
202should return @code{GS_ALL_DONE}.  Otherwise it should return
203@code{GS_OK}, which will cause the expression to be processed again.
204If the callback encounters an error during the transformation (because
205the front end is relying on the gimplification process to finish
206semantic checks), it should return @code{GS_ERROR}.
207
208@node Pass manager
209@section Pass manager
210
211The pass manager is located in @file{passes.c}, @file{tree-optimize.c}
212and @file{tree-pass.h}.
213It processes passes as described in @file{passes.def}.
214Its job is to run all of the individual passes in the correct order,
215and take care of standard bookkeeping that applies to every pass.
216
217The theory of operation is that each pass defines a structure that
218represents everything we need to know about that pass---when it
219should be run, how it should be run, what intermediate language
220form or on-the-side data structures it needs.  We register the pass
221to be run in some particular order, and the pass manager arranges
222for everything to happen in the correct order.
223
224The actuality doesn't completely live up to the theory at present.
225Command-line switches and @code{timevar_id_t} enumerations must still
226be defined elsewhere.  The pass manager validates constraints but does
227not attempt to (re-)generate data structures or lower intermediate
228language form based on the requirements of the next pass.  Nevertheless,
229what is present is useful, and a far sight better than nothing at all.
230
231Each pass should have a unique name.
232Each pass may have its own dump file (for GCC debugging purposes).
233Passes with a name starting with a star do not dump anything.
234Sometimes passes are supposed to share a dump file / option name.
235To still give these unique names, you can use a prefix that is delimited
236by a space from the part that is used for the dump file / option name.
237E.g. When the pass name is "ud dce", the name used for dump file/options
238is "dce".
239
240TODO: describe the global variables set up by the pass manager,
241and a brief description of how a new pass should use it.
242I need to look at what info RTL passes use first@enddots{}
243
244@node Tree SSA passes
245@section Tree SSA passes
246
247The following briefly describes the Tree optimization passes that are
248run after gimplification and what source files they are located in.
249
250@itemize @bullet
251@item Remove useless statements
252
253This pass is an extremely simple sweep across the gimple code in which
254we identify obviously dead code and remove it.  Here we do things like
255simplify @code{if} statements with constant conditions, remove
256exception handling constructs surrounding code that obviously cannot
257throw, remove lexical bindings that contain no variables, and other
258assorted simplistic cleanups.  The idea is to get rid of the obvious
259stuff quickly rather than wait until later when it's more work to get
260rid of it.  This pass is located in @file{tree-cfg.c} and described by
261@code{pass_remove_useless_stmts}.
262
263@item OpenMP lowering
264
265If OpenMP generation (@option{-fopenmp}) is enabled, this pass lowers
266OpenMP constructs into GIMPLE.
267
268Lowering of OpenMP constructs involves creating replacement
269expressions for local variables that have been mapped using data
270sharing clauses, exposing the control flow of most synchronization
271directives and adding region markers to facilitate the creation of the
272control flow graph.  The pass is located in @file{omp-low.c} and is
273described by @code{pass_lower_omp}.
274
275@item OpenMP expansion
276
277If OpenMP generation (@option{-fopenmp}) is enabled, this pass expands
278parallel regions into their own functions to be invoked by the thread
279library.  The pass is located in @file{omp-low.c} and is described by
280@code{pass_expand_omp}.
281
282@item Lower control flow
283
284This pass flattens @code{if} statements (@code{COND_EXPR})
285and moves lexical bindings (@code{BIND_EXPR}) out of line.  After
286this pass, all @code{if} statements will have exactly two @code{goto}
287statements in its @code{then} and @code{else} arms.  Lexical binding
288information for each statement will be found in @code{TREE_BLOCK} rather
289than being inferred from its position under a @code{BIND_EXPR}.  This
290pass is found in @file{gimple-low.c} and is described by
291@code{pass_lower_cf}.
292
293@item Lower exception handling control flow
294
295This pass decomposes high-level exception handling constructs
296(@code{TRY_FINALLY_EXPR} and @code{TRY_CATCH_EXPR}) into a form
297that explicitly represents the control flow involved.  After this
298pass, @code{lookup_stmt_eh_region} will return a non-negative
299number for any statement that may have EH control flow semantics;
300examine @code{tree_can_throw_internal} or @code{tree_can_throw_external}
301for exact semantics.  Exact control flow may be extracted from
302@code{foreach_reachable_handler}.  The EH region nesting tree is defined
303in @file{except.h} and built in @file{except.c}.  The lowering pass
304itself is in @file{tree-eh.c} and is described by @code{pass_lower_eh}.
305
306@item Build the control flow graph
307
308This pass decomposes a function into basic blocks and creates all of
309the edges that connect them.  It is located in @file{tree-cfg.c} and
310is described by @code{pass_build_cfg}.
311
312@item Find all referenced variables
313
314This pass walks the entire function and collects an array of all
315variables referenced in the function, @code{referenced_vars}.  The
316index at which a variable is found in the array is used as a UID
317for the variable within this function.  This data is needed by the
318SSA rewriting routines.  The pass is located in @file{tree-dfa.c}
319and is described by @code{pass_referenced_vars}.
320
321@item Enter static single assignment form
322
323This pass rewrites the function such that it is in SSA form.  After
324this pass, all @code{is_gimple_reg} variables will be referenced by
325@code{SSA_NAME}, and all occurrences of other variables will be
326annotated with @code{VDEFS} and @code{VUSES}; PHI nodes will have
327been inserted as necessary for each basic block.  This pass is
328located in @file{tree-ssa.c} and is described by @code{pass_build_ssa}.
329
330@item Warn for uninitialized variables
331
332This pass scans the function for uses of @code{SSA_NAME}s that
333are fed by default definition.  For non-parameter variables, such
334uses are uninitialized.  The pass is run twice, before and after
335optimization (if turned on).  In the first pass we only warn for uses that are
336positively uninitialized; in the second pass we warn for uses that
337are possibly uninitialized.  The pass is located in @file{tree-ssa.c}
338and is defined by @code{pass_early_warn_uninitialized} and
339@code{pass_late_warn_uninitialized}.
340
341@item Dead code elimination
342
343This pass scans the function for statements without side effects whose
344result is unused.  It does not do memory life analysis, so any value
345that is stored in memory is considered used.  The pass is run multiple
346times throughout the optimization process.  It is located in
347@file{tree-ssa-dce.c} and is described by @code{pass_dce}.
348
349@item Dominator optimizations
350
351This pass performs trivial dominator-based copy and constant propagation,
352expression simplification, and jump threading.  It is run multiple times
353throughout the optimization process.  It is located in @file{tree-ssa-dom.c}
354and is described by @code{pass_dominator}.
355
356@item Forward propagation of single-use variables
357
358This pass attempts to remove redundant computation by substituting
359variables that are used once into the expression that uses them and
360seeing if the result can be simplified.  It is located in
361@file{tree-ssa-forwprop.c} and is described by @code{pass_forwprop}.
362
363@item Copy Renaming
364
365This pass attempts to change the name of compiler temporaries involved in
366copy operations such that SSA->normal can coalesce the copy away.  When compiler
367temporaries are copies of user variables, it also renames the compiler
368temporary to the user variable resulting in better use of user symbols.  It is
369located in @file{tree-ssa-copyrename.c} and is described by
370@code{pass_copyrename}.
371
372@item PHI node optimizations
373
374This pass recognizes forms of PHI inputs that can be represented as
375conditional expressions and rewrites them into straight line code.
376It is located in @file{tree-ssa-phiopt.c} and is described by
377@code{pass_phiopt}.
378
379@item May-alias optimization
380
381This pass performs a flow sensitive SSA-based points-to analysis.
382The resulting may-alias, must-alias, and escape analysis information
383is used to promote variables from in-memory addressable objects to
384non-aliased variables that can be renamed into SSA form.  We also
385update the @code{VDEF}/@code{VUSE} memory tags for non-renameable
386aggregates so that we get fewer false kills.  The pass is located
387in @file{tree-ssa-alias.c} and is described by @code{pass_may_alias}.
388
389Interprocedural points-to information is located in
390@file{tree-ssa-structalias.c} and described by @code{pass_ipa_pta}.
391
392@item Profiling
393
394This pass rewrites the function in order to collect runtime block
395and value profiling data.  Such data may be fed back into the compiler
396on a subsequent run so as to allow optimization based on expected
397execution frequencies.  The pass is located in @file{predict.c} and
398is described by @code{pass_profile}.
399
400@item Lower complex arithmetic
401
402This pass rewrites complex arithmetic operations into their component
403scalar arithmetic operations.  The pass is located in @file{tree-complex.c}
404and is described by @code{pass_lower_complex}.
405
406@item Scalar replacement of aggregates
407
408This pass rewrites suitable non-aliased local aggregate variables into
409a set of scalar variables.  The resulting scalar variables are
410rewritten into SSA form, which allows subsequent optimization passes
411to do a significantly better job with them.  The pass is located in
412@file{tree-sra.c} and is described by @code{pass_sra}.
413
414@item Dead store elimination
415
416This pass eliminates stores to memory that are subsequently overwritten
417by another store, without any intervening loads.  The pass is located
418in @file{tree-ssa-dse.c} and is described by @code{pass_dse}.
419
420@item Tail recursion elimination
421
422This pass transforms tail recursion into a loop.  It is located in
423@file{tree-tailcall.c} and is described by @code{pass_tail_recursion}.
424
425@item Forward store motion
426
427This pass sinks stores and assignments down the flowgraph closer to their
428use point.  The pass is located in @file{tree-ssa-sink.c} and is
429described by @code{pass_sink_code}.
430
431@item Partial redundancy elimination
432
433This pass eliminates partially redundant computations, as well as
434performing load motion.  The pass is located in @file{tree-ssa-pre.c}
435and is described by @code{pass_pre}.
436
437Just before partial redundancy elimination, if
438@option{-funsafe-math-optimizations} is on, GCC tries to convert
439divisions to multiplications by the reciprocal.  The pass is located
440in @file{tree-ssa-math-opts.c} and is described by
441@code{pass_cse_reciprocal}.
442
443@item Full redundancy elimination
444
445This is a simpler form of PRE that only eliminates redundancies that
446occur on all paths.  It is located in @file{tree-ssa-pre.c} and
447described by @code{pass_fre}.
448
449@item Loop optimization
450
451The main driver of the pass is placed in @file{tree-ssa-loop.c}
452and described by @code{pass_loop}.
453
454The optimizations performed by this pass are:
455
456Loop invariant motion.  This pass moves only invariants that
457would be hard to handle on RTL level (function calls, operations that expand to
458nontrivial sequences of insns).  With @option{-funswitch-loops} it also moves
459operands of conditions that are invariant out of the loop, so that we can use
460just trivial invariantness analysis in loop unswitching.  The pass also includes
461store motion.  The pass is implemented in @file{tree-ssa-loop-im.c}.
462
463Canonical induction variable creation.  This pass creates a simple counter
464for number of iterations of the loop and replaces the exit condition of the
465loop using it, in case when a complicated analysis is necessary to determine
466the number of iterations.  Later optimizations then may determine the number
467easily.  The pass is implemented in @file{tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c}.
468
469Induction variable optimizations.  This pass performs standard induction
470variable optimizations, including strength reduction, induction variable
471merging and induction variable elimination.  The pass is implemented in
472@file{tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c}.
473
474Loop unswitching.  This pass moves the conditional jumps that are invariant
475out of the loops.  To achieve this, a duplicate of the loop is created for
476each possible outcome of conditional jump(s).  The pass is implemented in
477@file{tree-ssa-loop-unswitch.c}.  This pass should eventually replace the
478RTL level loop unswitching in @file{loop-unswitch.c}, but currently
479the RTL level pass is not completely redundant yet due to deficiencies
480in tree level alias analysis.
481
482The optimizations also use various utility functions contained in
483@file{tree-ssa-loop-manip.c}, @file{cfgloop.c}, @file{cfgloopanal.c} and
484@file{cfgloopmanip.c}.
485
486Vectorization.  This pass transforms loops to operate on vector types
487instead of scalar types.  Data parallelism across loop iterations is exploited
488to group data elements from consecutive iterations into a vector and operate
489on them in parallel.  Depending on available target support the loop is
490conceptually unrolled by a factor @code{VF} (vectorization factor), which is
491the number of elements operated upon in parallel in each iteration, and the
492@code{VF} copies of each scalar operation are fused to form a vector operation.
493Additional loop transformations such as peeling and versioning may take place
494to align the number of iterations, and to align the memory accesses in the
495loop.
496The pass is implemented in @file{tree-vectorizer.c} (the main driver),
497@file{tree-vect-loop.c} and @file{tree-vect-loop-manip.c} (loop specific parts
498and general loop utilities), @file{tree-vect-slp} (loop-aware SLP
499functionality), @file{tree-vect-stmts.c} and @file{tree-vect-data-refs.c}.
500Analysis of data references is in @file{tree-data-ref.c}.
501
502SLP Vectorization.  This pass performs vectorization of straight-line code. The
503pass is implemented in @file{tree-vectorizer.c} (the main driver),
504@file{tree-vect-slp.c}, @file{tree-vect-stmts.c} and
505@file{tree-vect-data-refs.c}.
506
507Autoparallelization.  This pass splits the loop iteration space to run
508into several threads.  The pass is implemented in @file{tree-parloops.c}.
509
510Graphite is a loop transformation framework based on the polyhedral
511model.  Graphite stands for Gimple Represented as Polyhedra.  The
512internals of this infrastructure are documented in
513@w{@uref{http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Graphite}}.  The passes working on
514this representation are implemented in the various @file{graphite-*}
515files.
516
517@item Tree level if-conversion for vectorizer
518
519This pass applies if-conversion to simple loops to help vectorizer.
520We identify if convertible loops, if-convert statements and merge
521basic blocks in one big block.  The idea is to present loop in such
522form so that vectorizer can have one to one mapping between statements
523and available vector operations.  This pass is located in
524@file{tree-if-conv.c} and is described by @code{pass_if_conversion}.
525
526@item Conditional constant propagation
527
528This pass relaxes a lattice of values in order to identify those
529that must be constant even in the presence of conditional branches.
530The pass is located in @file{tree-ssa-ccp.c} and is described
531by @code{pass_ccp}.
532
533A related pass that works on memory loads and stores, and not just
534register values, is located in @file{tree-ssa-ccp.c} and described by
535@code{pass_store_ccp}.
536
537@item Conditional copy propagation
538
539This is similar to constant propagation but the lattice of values is
540the ``copy-of'' relation.  It eliminates redundant copies from the
541code.  The pass is located in @file{tree-ssa-copy.c} and described by
542@code{pass_copy_prop}.
543
544A related pass that works on memory copies, and not just register
545copies, is located in @file{tree-ssa-copy.c} and described by
546@code{pass_store_copy_prop}.
547
548@item Value range propagation
549
550This transformation is similar to constant propagation but
551instead of propagating single constant values, it propagates
552known value ranges.  The implementation is based on Patterson's
553range propagation algorithm (Accurate Static Branch Prediction by
554Value Range Propagation, J. R. C. Patterson, PLDI '95).  In
555contrast to Patterson's algorithm, this implementation does not
556propagate branch probabilities nor it uses more than a single
557range per SSA name. This means that the current implementation
558cannot be used for branch prediction (though adapting it would
559not be difficult).  The pass is located in @file{tree-vrp.c} and is
560described by @code{pass_vrp}.
561
562@item Folding built-in functions
563
564This pass simplifies built-in functions, as applicable, with constant
565arguments or with inferable string lengths.  It is located in
566@file{tree-ssa-ccp.c} and is described by @code{pass_fold_builtins}.
567
568@item Split critical edges
569
570This pass identifies critical edges and inserts empty basic blocks
571such that the edge is no longer critical.  The pass is located in
572@file{tree-cfg.c} and is described by @code{pass_split_crit_edges}.
573
574@item Control dependence dead code elimination
575
576This pass is a stronger form of dead code elimination that can
577eliminate unnecessary control flow statements.   It is located
578in @file{tree-ssa-dce.c} and is described by @code{pass_cd_dce}.
579
580@item Tail call elimination
581
582This pass identifies function calls that may be rewritten into
583jumps.  No code transformation is actually applied here, but the
584data and control flow problem is solved.  The code transformation
585requires target support, and so is delayed until RTL@.  In the
586meantime @code{CALL_EXPR_TAILCALL} is set indicating the possibility.
587The pass is located in @file{tree-tailcall.c} and is described by
588@code{pass_tail_calls}.  The RTL transformation is handled by
589@code{fixup_tail_calls} in @file{calls.c}.
590
591@item Warn for function return without value
592
593For non-void functions, this pass locates return statements that do
594not specify a value and issues a warning.  Such a statement may have
595been injected by falling off the end of the function.  This pass is
596run last so that we have as much time as possible to prove that the
597statement is not reachable.  It is located in @file{tree-cfg.c} and
598is described by @code{pass_warn_function_return}.
599
600@item Leave static single assignment form
601
602This pass rewrites the function such that it is in normal form.  At
603the same time, we eliminate as many single-use temporaries as possible,
604so the intermediate language is no longer GIMPLE, but GENERIC@.  The
605pass is located in @file{tree-outof-ssa.c} and is described by
606@code{pass_del_ssa}.
607
608@item Merge PHI nodes that feed into one another
609
610This is part of the CFG cleanup passes.  It attempts to join PHI nodes
611from a forwarder CFG block into another block with PHI nodes.  The
612pass is located in @file{tree-cfgcleanup.c} and is described by
613@code{pass_merge_phi}.
614
615@item Return value optimization
616
617If a function always returns the same local variable, and that local
618variable is an aggregate type, then the variable is replaced with the
619return value for the function (i.e., the function's DECL_RESULT).  This
620is equivalent to the C++ named return value optimization applied to
621GIMPLE@.  The pass is located in @file{tree-nrv.c} and is described by
622@code{pass_nrv}.
623
624@item Return slot optimization
625
626If a function returns a memory object and is called as @code{var =
627foo()}, this pass tries to change the call so that the address of
628@code{var} is sent to the caller to avoid an extra memory copy.  This
629pass is located in @code{tree-nrv.c} and is described by
630@code{pass_return_slot}.
631
632@item Optimize calls to @code{__builtin_object_size}
633
634This is a propagation pass similar to CCP that tries to remove calls
635to @code{__builtin_object_size} when the size of the object can be
636computed at compile-time.  This pass is located in
637@file{tree-object-size.c} and is described by
638@code{pass_object_sizes}.
639
640@item Loop invariant motion
641
642This pass removes expensive loop-invariant computations out of loops.
643The pass is located in @file{tree-ssa-loop.c} and described by
644@code{pass_lim}.
645
646@item Loop nest optimizations
647
648This is a family of loop transformations that works on loop nests.  It
649includes loop interchange, scaling, skewing and reversal and they are
650all geared to the optimization of data locality in array traversals
651and the removal of dependencies that hamper optimizations such as loop
652parallelization and vectorization.  The pass is located in
653@file{tree-loop-linear.c} and described by
654@code{pass_linear_transform}.
655
656@item Removal of empty loops
657
658This pass removes loops with no code in them.  The pass is located in
659@file{tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c} and described by
660@code{pass_empty_loop}.
661
662@item Unrolling of small loops
663
664This pass completely unrolls loops with few iterations.  The pass
665is located in @file{tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c} and described by
666@code{pass_complete_unroll}.
667
668@item Predictive commoning
669
670This pass makes the code reuse the computations from the previous
671iterations of the loops, especially loads and stores to memory.
672It does so by storing the values of these computations to a bank
673of temporary variables that are rotated at the end of loop.  To avoid
674the need for this rotation, the loop is then unrolled and the copies
675of the loop body are rewritten to use the appropriate version of
676the temporary variable.  This pass is located in @file{tree-predcom.c}
677and described by @code{pass_predcom}.
678
679@item Array prefetching
680
681This pass issues prefetch instructions for array references inside
682loops.  The pass is located in @file{tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c} and
683described by @code{pass_loop_prefetch}.
684
685@item Reassociation
686
687This pass rewrites arithmetic expressions to enable optimizations that
688operate on them, like redundancy elimination and vectorization.  The
689pass is located in @file{tree-ssa-reassoc.c} and described by
690@code{pass_reassoc}.
691
692@item Optimization of @code{stdarg} functions
693
694This pass tries to avoid the saving of register arguments into the
695stack on entry to @code{stdarg} functions.  If the function doesn't
696use any @code{va_start} macros, no registers need to be saved.  If
697@code{va_start} macros are used, the @code{va_list} variables don't
698escape the function, it is only necessary to save registers that will
699be used in @code{va_arg} macros.  For instance, if @code{va_arg} is
700only used with integral types in the function, floating point
701registers don't need to be saved.  This pass is located in
702@code{tree-stdarg.c} and described by @code{pass_stdarg}.
703
704@end itemize
705
706@node RTL passes
707@section RTL passes
708
709The following briefly describes the RTL generation and optimization
710passes that are run after the Tree optimization passes.
711
712@itemize @bullet
713@item RTL generation
714
715@c Avoiding overfull is tricky here.
716The source files for RTL generation include
717@file{stmt.c},
718@file{calls.c},
719@file{expr.c},
720@file{explow.c},
721@file{expmed.c},
722@file{function.c},
723@file{optabs.c}
724and @file{emit-rtl.c}.
725Also, the file
726@file{insn-emit.c}, generated from the machine description by the
727program @code{genemit}, is used in this pass.  The header file
728@file{expr.h} is used for communication within this pass.
729
730@findex genflags
731@findex gencodes
732The header files @file{insn-flags.h} and @file{insn-codes.h},
733generated from the machine description by the programs @code{genflags}
734and @code{gencodes}, tell this pass which standard names are available
735for use and which patterns correspond to them.
736
737@item Generation of exception landing pads
738
739This pass generates the glue that handles communication between the
740exception handling library routines and the exception handlers within
741the function.  Entry points in the function that are invoked by the
742exception handling library are called @dfn{landing pads}.  The code
743for this pass is located in @file{except.c}.
744
745@item Control flow graph cleanup
746
747This pass removes unreachable code, simplifies jumps to next, jumps to
748jump, jumps across jumps, etc.  The pass is run multiple times.
749For historical reasons, it is occasionally referred to as the ``jump
750optimization pass''.  The bulk of the code for this pass is in
751@file{cfgcleanup.c}, and there are support routines in @file{cfgrtl.c}
752and @file{jump.c}.
753
754@item Forward propagation of single-def values
755
756This pass attempts to remove redundant computation by substituting
757variables that come from a single definition, and
758seeing if the result can be simplified.  It performs copy propagation
759and addressing mode selection.  The pass is run twice, with values
760being propagated into loops only on the second run.  The code is
761located in @file{fwprop.c}.
762
763@item Common subexpression elimination
764
765This pass removes redundant computation within basic blocks, and
766optimizes addressing modes based on cost.  The pass is run twice.
767The code for this pass is located in @file{cse.c}.
768
769@item Global common subexpression elimination
770
771This pass performs two
772different types of GCSE  depending on whether you are optimizing for
773size or not (LCM based GCSE tends to increase code size for a gain in
774speed, while Morel-Renvoise based GCSE does not).
775When optimizing for size, GCSE is done using Morel-Renvoise Partial
776Redundancy Elimination, with the exception that it does not try to move
777invariants out of loops---that is left to  the loop optimization pass.
778If MR PRE GCSE is done, code hoisting (aka unification) is also done, as
779well as load motion.
780If you are optimizing for speed, LCM (lazy code motion) based GCSE is
781done.  LCM is based on the work of Knoop, Ruthing, and Steffen.  LCM
782based GCSE also does loop invariant code motion.  We also perform load
783and store motion when optimizing for speed.
784Regardless of which type of GCSE is used, the GCSE pass also performs
785global constant and  copy propagation.
786The source file for this pass is @file{gcse.c}, and the LCM routines
787are in @file{lcm.c}.
788
789@item Loop optimization
790
791This pass performs several loop related optimizations.
792The source files @file{cfgloopanal.c} and @file{cfgloopmanip.c} contain
793generic loop analysis and manipulation code.  Initialization and finalization
794of loop structures is handled by @file{loop-init.c}.
795A loop invariant motion pass is implemented in @file{loop-invariant.c}.
796Basic block level optimizations---unrolling, peeling and unswitching loops---
797are implemented in @file{loop-unswitch.c} and @file{loop-unroll.c}.
798Replacing of the exit condition of loops by special machine-dependent
799instructions is handled by @file{loop-doloop.c}.
800
801@item Jump bypassing
802
803This pass is an aggressive form of GCSE that transforms the control
804flow graph of a function by propagating constants into conditional
805branch instructions.  The source file for this pass is @file{gcse.c}.
806
807@item If conversion
808
809This pass attempts to replace conditional branches and surrounding
810assignments with arithmetic, boolean value producing comparison
811instructions, and conditional move instructions.  In the very last
812invocation after reload/LRA, it will generate predicated instructions
813when supported by the target.  The code is located in @file{ifcvt.c}.
814
815@item Web construction
816
817This pass splits independent uses of each pseudo-register.  This can
818improve effect of the other transformation, such as CSE or register
819allocation.  The code for this pass is located in @file{web.c}.
820
821@item Instruction combination
822
823This pass attempts to combine groups of two or three instructions that
824are related by data flow into single instructions.  It combines the
825RTL expressions for the instructions by substitution, simplifies the
826result using algebra, and then attempts to match the result against
827the machine description.  The code is located in @file{combine.c}.
828
829@item Mode switching optimization
830
831This pass looks for instructions that require the processor to be in a
832specific ``mode'' and minimizes the number of mode changes required to
833satisfy all users.  What these modes are, and what they apply to are
834completely target-specific.  The code for this pass is located in
835@file{mode-switching.c}.
836
837@cindex modulo scheduling
838@cindex sms, swing, software pipelining
839@item Modulo scheduling
840
841This pass looks at innermost loops and reorders their instructions
842by overlapping different iterations.  Modulo scheduling is performed
843immediately before instruction scheduling.  The code for this pass is
844located in @file{modulo-sched.c}.
845
846@item Instruction scheduling
847
848This pass looks for instructions whose output will not be available by
849the time that it is used in subsequent instructions.  Memory loads and
850floating point instructions often have this behavior on RISC machines.
851It re-orders instructions within a basic block to try to separate the
852definition and use of items that otherwise would cause pipeline
853stalls.  This pass is performed twice, before and after register
854allocation.  The code for this pass is located in @file{haifa-sched.c},
855@file{sched-deps.c}, @file{sched-ebb.c}, @file{sched-rgn.c} and
856@file{sched-vis.c}.
857
858@item Register allocation
859
860These passes make sure that all occurrences of pseudo registers are
861eliminated, either by allocating them to a hard register, replacing
862them by an equivalent expression (e.g.@: a constant) or by placing
863them on the stack.  This is done in several subpasses:
864
865@itemize @bullet
866@item
867The integrated register allocator (@acronym{IRA}).  It is called
868integrated because coalescing, register live range splitting, and hard
869register preferencing are done on-the-fly during coloring.  It also
870has better integration with the reload/LRA pass.  Pseudo-registers spilled
871by the allocator or the reload/LRA have still a chance to get
872hard-registers if the reload/LRA evicts some pseudo-registers from
873hard-registers.  The allocator helps to choose better pseudos for
874spilling based on their live ranges and to coalesce stack slots
875allocated for the spilled pseudo-registers.  IRA is a regional
876register allocator which is transformed into Chaitin-Briggs allocator
877if there is one region.  By default, IRA chooses regions using
878register pressure but the user can force it to use one region or
879regions corresponding to all loops.
880
881Source files of the allocator are @file{ira.c}, @file{ira-build.c},
882@file{ira-costs.c}, @file{ira-conflicts.c}, @file{ira-color.c},
883@file{ira-emit.c}, @file{ira-lives}, plus header files @file{ira.h}
884and @file{ira-int.h} used for the communication between the allocator
885and the rest of the compiler and between the IRA files.
886
887@cindex reloading
888@item
889Reloading.  This pass renumbers pseudo registers with the hardware
890registers numbers they were allocated.  Pseudo registers that did not
891get hard registers are replaced with stack slots.  Then it finds
892instructions that are invalid because a value has failed to end up in
893a register, or has ended up in a register of the wrong kind.  It fixes
894up these instructions by reloading the problematical values
895temporarily into registers.  Additional instructions are generated to
896do the copying.
897
898The reload pass also optionally eliminates the frame pointer and inserts
899instructions to save and restore call-clobbered registers around calls.
900
901Source files are @file{reload.c} and @file{reload1.c}, plus the header
902@file{reload.h} used for communication between them.
903
904@cindex Local Register Allocator (LRA)
905@item
906This pass is a modern replacement of the reload pass.  Source files
907are @file{lra.c}, @file{lra-assign.c}, @file{lra-coalesce.c},
908@file{lra-constraints.c}, @file{lra-eliminations.c},
909@file{lra-equivs.c}, @file{lra-lives.c}, @file{lra-saves.c},
910@file{lra-spills.c}, the header @file{lra-int.h} used for
911communication between them, and the header @file{lra.h} used for
912communication between LRA and the rest of compiler.
913
914Unlike the reload pass, intermediate LRA decisions are reflected in
915RTL as much as possible.  This reduces the number of target-dependent
916macros and hooks, leaving instruction constraints as the primary
917source of control.
918
919LRA is run on targets for which TARGET_LRA_P returns true.
920@end itemize
921
922@item Basic block reordering
923
924This pass implements profile guided code positioning.  If profile
925information is not available, various types of static analysis are
926performed to make the predictions normally coming from the profile
927feedback (IE execution frequency, branch probability, etc).  It is
928implemented in the file @file{bb-reorder.c}, and the various
929prediction routines are in @file{predict.c}.
930
931@item Variable tracking
932
933This pass computes where the variables are stored at each
934position in code and generates notes describing the variable locations
935to RTL code.  The location lists are then generated according to these
936notes to debug information if the debugging information format supports
937location lists.  The code is located in @file{var-tracking.c}.
938
939@item Delayed branch scheduling
940
941This optional pass attempts to find instructions that can go into the
942delay slots of other instructions, usually jumps and calls.  The code
943for this pass is located in @file{reorg.c}.
944
945@item Branch shortening
946
947On many RISC machines, branch instructions have a limited range.
948Thus, longer sequences of instructions must be used for long branches.
949In this pass, the compiler figures out what how far each instruction
950will be from each other instruction, and therefore whether the usual
951instructions, or the longer sequences, must be used for each branch.
952The code for this pass is located in @file{final.c}.
953
954@item Register-to-stack conversion
955
956Conversion from usage of some hard registers to usage of a register
957stack may be done at this point.  Currently, this is supported only
958for the floating-point registers of the Intel 80387 coprocessor.  The
959code for this pass is located in @file{reg-stack.c}.
960
961@item Final
962
963This pass outputs the assembler code for the function.  The source files
964are @file{final.c} plus @file{insn-output.c}; the latter is generated
965automatically from the machine description by the tool @file{genoutput}.
966The header file @file{conditions.h} is used for communication between
967these files.
968
969@item Debugging information output
970
971This is run after final because it must output the stack slot offsets
972for pseudo registers that did not get hard registers.  Source files
973are @file{dbxout.c} for DBX symbol table format, @file{sdbout.c} for
974SDB symbol table format, @file{dwarfout.c} for DWARF symbol table
975format, files @file{dwarf2out.c} and @file{dwarf2asm.c} for DWARF2
976symbol table format, and @file{vmsdbgout.c} for VMS debug symbol table
977format.
978
979@end itemize
980
981@node Optimization info
982@section Optimization info
983@include optinfo.texi
984