• Home
  • History
  • Annotate
Name Date Size #Lines LOC

..03-May-2022-

ChangelogH A D18-Oct-20054.5 KiB123119

CreditsH A D28-Jan-2005217 42

MakefileH A D03-May-20224.1 KiB13566

READMEH A D20-Sep-200059.4 KiB947842

README.cryptcatH A D28-Jan-20051.9 KiB4734

farm9crypt.ccH A D03-May-20224 KiB172109

farm9crypt.hH A D18-Dec-2004437 165

generic.hH A D23-Nov-200411.3 KiB376130

netcat.blurbH A D20-Sep-20002.6 KiB6252

netcat.cH A D03-May-202258.2 KiB1,7081,235

twofish2.ccH A D03-May-202226.5 KiB847641

twofish2.hH A D18-Dec-20043.1 KiB12381

README

1Netcat 1.10
2===========							   /\_/\
3								  / 0 0 \
4Netcat is a simple Unix utility which reads and writes data	 ====v====
5across network connections, using TCP or UDP protocol.		  \  W  /
6It is designed to be a reliable "back-end" tool that can	  |     |     _
7be used directly or easily driven by other programs and		  / ___ \    /
8scripts.  At the same time, it is a feature-rich network	 / /   \ \  |
9debugging and exploration tool, since it can create almost	(((-----)))-'
10any kind of connection you would need and has several		 /
11interesting built-in capabilities.  Netcat, or "nc" as the	(      ___
12actual program is named, should have been supplied long ago	 \__.=|___E
13as another one of those cryptic but standard Unix tools.	        /
14
15In the simplest usage, "nc host port" creates a TCP connection to the given
16port on the given target host.  Your standard input is then sent to the host,
17and anything that comes back across the connection is sent to your standard
18output.  This continues indefinitely, until the network side of the connection
19shuts down.  Note that this behavior is different from most other applications
20which shut everything down and exit after an end-of-file on the standard input.
21
22Netcat can also function as a server, by listening for inbound connections
23on arbitrary ports and then doing the same reading and writing.  With minor
24limitations, netcat doesn't really care if it runs in "client" or "server"
25mode -- it still shovels data back and forth until there isn't any more left.
26In either mode, shutdown can be forced after a configurable time of inactivity
27on the network side.
28
29And it can do this via UDP too, so netcat is possibly the "udp telnet-like"
30application you always wanted for testing your UDP-mode servers.  UDP, as the
31"U" implies, gives less reliable data transmission than TCP connections and
32some systems may have trouble sending large amounts of data that way, but it's
33still a useful capability to have.
34
35You may be asking "why not just use telnet to connect to arbitrary ports?"
36Valid question, and here are some reasons.  Telnet has the "standard input
37EOF" problem, so one must introduce calculated delays in driving scripts to
38allow network output to finish.  This is the main reason netcat stays running
39until the *network* side closes.  Telnet also will not transfer arbitrary
40binary data, because certain characters are interpreted as telnet options and
41are thus removed from the data stream.  Telnet also emits some of its
42diagnostic messages to standard output, where netcat keeps such things
43religiously separated from its *output* and will never modify any of the real
44data in transit unless you *really* want it to.  And of course telnet is
45incapable of listening for inbound connections, or using UDP instead.  Netcat
46doesn't have any of these limitations, is much smaller and faster than telnet,
47and has many other advantages.
48
49Some of netcat's major features are:
50
51	Outbound or inbound connections, TCP or UDP, to or from any ports
52	Full DNS forward/reverse checking, with appropriate warnings
53	Ability to use any local source port
54	Ability to use any locally-configured network source address
55	Built-in port-scanning capabilities, with randomizer
56	Built-in loose source-routing capability
57	Can read command line arguments from standard input
58	Slow-send mode, one line every N seconds
59	Hex dump of transmitted and received data
60	Optional ability to let another program service established connections
61	Optional telnet-options responder
62
63Efforts have been made to have netcat "do the right thing" in all its various
64modes.  If you believe that it is doing the wrong thing under whatever
65circumstances, please notify me and tell me how you think it should behave.
66If netcat is not able to do some task you think up, minor tweaks to the code
67will probably fix that.  It provides a basic and easily-modified template for
68writing other network applications, and I certainly encourage people to make
69custom mods and send in any improvements they make to it.  This is the second
70release; the overall differences from 1.00 are relatively minor and have mostly
71to do with portability and bugfixes.  Many people provided greatly appreciated
72fixes and comments on the 1.00 release.  Continued feedback from the Internet
73community is always welcome!
74
75Netcat is entirely my own creation, although plenty of other code was used as
76examples.  It is freely given away to the Internet community in the hope that
77it will be useful, with no restrictions except giving credit where it is due.
78No GPLs, Berkeley copyrights or any of that nonsense.  The author assumes NO
79responsibility for how anyone uses it.  If netcat makes you rich somehow and
80you're feeling generous, mail me a check.  If you are affiliated in any way
81with Microsoft Network, get a life.  Always ski in control.  Comments,
82questions, and patches to hobbit@avian.org.
83
84Building
85========
86
87Compiling is fairly straightforward.  Examine the Makefile for a SYSTYPE that
88matches yours, and do "make <systype>".  The executable "nc" should appear.
89If there is no relevant SYSTYPE section, try "generic".  If you create new
90sections for generic.h and Makefile to support another platform, please follow
91the given format and mail back the diffs.
92
93There are a couple of other settable #defines in netcat.c, which you can
94include as DFLAGS="-DTHIS -DTHAT" to your "make" invocation without having to
95edit the Makefile.  See the following discussions for what they are and do.
96
97If you want to link against the resolver library on SunOS [recommended] and
98you have BIND 4.9.x, you may need to change XLIBS=-lresolv in the Makefile to
99XLIBS="-lresolv -l44bsd".
100
101Linux sys/time.h does not really support presetting of FD_SETSIZE; a harmless
102warning is issued.
103
104Some systems may warn about pointer types for signal().  No problem, though.
105
106Exploration of features
107=======================
108
109Where to begin?  Netcat is at the same time so simple and versatile, it's like
110trying to describe everything you can do with your Swiss Army knife.  This will
111go over the basics; you should also read the usage examples and notes later on
112which may give you even more ideas about what this sort of tool is good for.
113
114If no command arguments are given at all, netcat asks for them, reads a line
115from standard input, and breaks it up into arguments internally.  This can be
116useful when driving netcat from certain types of scripts, with the side effect
117of hiding your command line arguments from "ps" displays.
118
119The host argument can be a name or IP address.  If -n is specified, netcat
120will only accept numeric IP addresses and do no DNS lookups for anything.  If
121-n is not given and -v is turned on, netcat will do a full forward and reverse
122name and address lookup for the host, and warn you about the all-too-common
123problem of mismatched names in the DNS.  This often takes a little longer for
124connection setup, but is useful to know about.  There are circumstances under
125which this can *save* time, such as when you want to know the name for some IP
126address and also connect there.  Netcat will just tell you all about it, saving
127the manual steps of looking up the hostname yourself.  Normally mismatch-
128checking is case-insensitive per the DNS spec, but you can define ANAL at
129compile time to make it case-sensitive -- sometimes useful for uncovering minor
130errors in your own DNS files while poking around your networks.
131
132A port argument is required for outbound connections, and can be numeric or a
133name as listed in /etc/services.  If -n is specified, only numeric arguments
134are valid.  Special syntax and/or more than one port argument cause different
135behavior -- see details below about port-scanning.
136
137The -v switch controls the verbosity level of messages sent to standard error.
138You will probably want to run netcat most of the time with -v turned on, so you
139can see info about the connections it is trying to make.  You will probably
140also want to give a smallish -w argument, which limits the time spent trying to
141make a connection.  I usually alias "nc" to "nc -v -w 3", which makes it
142function just about the same for things I would otherwise use telnet to do.
143The timeout is easily changed by a subsequent -w argument which overrides the
144earlier one.  Specifying -v more than once makes diagnostic output MORE
145verbose.  If -v is not specified at all, netcat silently does its work unless
146some error happens, whereupon it describes the error and exits with a nonzero
147status.  Refused network connections are generally NOT considered to be errors,
148unless you only asked for a single TCP port and it was refused.
149
150Note that -w also sets the network inactivity timeout.  This does not have any
151effect until standard input closes, but then if nothing further arrives from
152the network in the next <timeout> seconds, netcat tries to read the net once
153more for good measure, and then closes and exits.  There are a lot of network
154services now that accept a small amount of input and return a large amount of
155output, such as Gopher and Web servers, which is the main reason netcat was
156written to "block" on the network staying open rather than standard input.
157Handling the timeout this way gives uniform behavior with network servers that
158*don't* close by themselves until told to.
159
160UDP connections are opened instead of TCP when -u is specified.  These aren't
161really "connections" per se since UDP is a connectionless protocol, although
162netcat does internally use the "connected UDP socket" mechanism that most
163kernels support.  Although netcat claims that an outgoing UDP connection is
164"open" immediately, no data is sent until something is read from standard
165input.  Only thereafter is it possible to determine whether there really is a
166UDP server on the other end, and often you just can't tell.  Most UDP protocols
167use timeouts and retries to do their thing and in many cases won't bother
168answering at all, so you should specify a timeout and hope for the best.  You
169will get more out of UDP connections if standard input is fed from a source
170of data that looks like various kinds of server requests.
171
172To obtain a hex dump file of the data sent either way, use "-o logfile".  The
173dump lines begin with "<" or ">" to respectively indicate "from the net" or
174"to the net", and contain the total count per direction, and hex and ascii
175representations of the traffic.  Capturing a hex dump naturally slows netcat
176down a bit, so don't use it where speed is critical.
177
178Netcat can bind to any local port, subject to privilege restrictions and ports
179that are already in use.  It is also possible to use a specific local network
180source address if it is that of a network interface on your machine.  [Note:
181this does not work correctly on all platforms.]  Use "-p portarg" to grab a
182specific local port, and "-s ip-addr" or "-s name" to have that be your source
183IP address.  This is often referred to as "anchoring the socket".  Root users
184can grab any unused source port including the "reserved" ones less than 1024.
185Absence of -p will bind to whatever unused port the system gives you, just like
186any other normal client connection, unless you use -r [see below].
187
188Listen mode will cause netcat to wait for an inbound connection, and then the
189same data transfer happens.  Thus, you can do "nc -l -p 1234 < filename" and
190when someone else connects to your port 1234, the file is sent to them whether
191they wanted it or not.  Listen mode is generally used along with a local port
192argument -- this is required for UDP mode, while TCP mode can have the system
193assign one and tell you what it is if -v is turned on.  If you specify a target
194host and optional port in listen mode, netcat will accept an inbound connection
195only from that host and if you specify one, only from that foreign source port.
196In verbose mode you'll be informed about the inbound connection, including what
197address and port it came from, and since listening on "any" applies to several
198possibilities, which address it came *to* on your end.  If the system supports
199IP socket options, netcat will attempt to retrieve any such options from an
200inbound connection and print them out in hex.
201
202If netcat is compiled with -DGAPING_SECURITY_HOLE, the -e argument specifies
203a program to exec after making or receiving a successful connection.  In the
204listening mode, this works similarly to "inetd" but only for a single instance.
205Use with GREAT CARE.  This piece of the code is normally not enabled; if you
206know what you're doing, have fun.  This hack also works in UDP mode.  Note that
207you can only supply -e with the name of the program, but no arguments.  If you
208want to launch something with an argument list, write a two-line wrapper script
209or just use inetd like always.
210
211If netcat is compiled with -DTELNET, the -t argument enables it to respond
212to telnet option negotiation [always in the negative, i.e. DONT or WONT].
213This allows it to connect to a telnetd and get past the initial negotiation
214far enough to get a login prompt from the server.  Since this feature has
215the potential to modify the data stream, it is not enabled by default.  You
216have to understand why you might need this and turn on the #define yourself.
217
218Data from the network connection is always delivered to standard output as
219efficiently as possible, using large 8K reads and writes.  Standard input is
220normally sent to the net the same way, but the -i switch specifies an "interval
221time" which slows this down considerably.  Standard input is still read in
222large batches, but netcat then tries to find where line breaks exist and sends
223one line every interval time.  Note that if standard input is a terminal, data
224is already read line by line, so unless you make the -i interval rather long,
225what you type will go out at a fairly normal rate.  -i is really designed
226for use when you want to "measure out" what is read from files or pipes.
227
228Port-scanning is a popular method for exploring what's out there.  Netcat
229accepts its commands with options first, then the target host, and everything
230thereafter is interpreted as port names or numbers, or ranges of ports in M-N
231syntax.  CAVEAT: some port names in /etc/services contain hyphens -- netcat
232currently will not correctly parse those, so specify ranges using numbers if
233you can.  If more than one port is thus specified, netcat connects to *all* of
234them, sending the same batch of data from standard input [up to 8K worth] to
235each one that is successfully connected to.  Specifying multiple ports also
236suppresses diagnostic messages about refused connections, unless -v is
237specified twice for "more verbosity".  This way you normally get notified only
238about genuinely open connections.  Example: "nc -v -w 2 -z target 20-30" will
239try connecting to every port between 20 and 30 [inclusive] at the target, and
240will likely inform you about an FTP server, telnet server, and mailer along the
241way.  The -z switch prevents sending any data to a TCP connection and very
242limited probe data to a UDP connection, and is thus useful as a fast scanning
243mode just to see what ports the target is listening on.  To limit scanning
244speed if desired, -i will insert a delay between each port probe.  There are
245some pitfalls with regard to UDP scanning, described later, but in general it
246works well.
247
248For each range of ports specified, scanning is normally done downward within
249that range.  If the -r switch is used, scanning hops randomly around within
250that range and reports open ports as it finds them.  [If you want them listed
251in order regardless, pipe standard error through "sort"...]  In addition, if
252random mode is in effect, the local source ports are also randomized.  This
253prevents netcat from exhibiting any kind of regular pattern in its scanning.
254You can exert fairly fine control over your scan by judicious use of -r and
255selected port ranges to cover.  If you use -r for a single connection, the
256source port will have a random value above 8192, rather than the next one the
257kernel would have assigned you.  Note that selecting a specific local port
258with -p overrides any local-port randomization.
259
260Many people are interested in testing network connectivity using IP source
261routing, even if it's only to make sure their own firewalls are blocking
262source-routed packets.  On systems that support it, the -g switch can be used
263multiple times [up to 8] to construct a loose-source-routed path for your
264connection, and the -G argument positions the "hop pointer" within the list.
265If your network allows source-routed traffic in and out, you can test
266connectivity to your own services via remote points in the internet.  Note that
267although newer BSD-flavor telnets also have source-routing capability, it isn't
268clearly documented and the command syntax is somewhat clumsy.  Netcat's
269handling of "-g" is modeled after "traceroute".
270
271Netcat tries its best to behave just like "cat".  It currently does nothing to
272terminal input modes, and does no end-of-line conversion.  Standard input from
273a terminal is read line by line with normal editing characters in effect.  You
274can freely suspend out of an interactive connection and resume.  ^C or whatever
275your interrupt character is will make netcat close the network connection and
276exit.  A switch to place the terminal in raw mode has been considered, but so
277far has not been necessary.  You can send raw binary data by reading it out of
278a file or piping from another program, so more meaningful effort would be spent
279writing an appropriate front-end driver.
280
281Netcat is not an "arbitrary packet generator", but the ability to talk to raw
282sockets and/or nit/bpf/dlpi may appear at some point.  Such things are clearly
283useful; I refer you to Darren Reed's excellent ip_filter package, which now
284includes a tool to construct and send raw packets with any contents you want.
285
286Example uses -- the light side
287==============================
288
289Again, this is a very partial list of possibilities, but it may get you to
290think up more applications for netcat.  Driving netcat with simple shell or
291expect scripts is an easy and flexible way to do fairly complex tasks,
292especially if you're not into coding network tools in C.  My coding isn't
293particularly strong either [although undoubtedly better after writing this
294thing!], so I tend to construct bare-metal tools like this that I can trivially
295plug into other applications.  Netcat doubles as a teaching tool -- one can
296learn a great deal about more complex network protocols by trying to simulate
297them through raw connections!
298
299An example of netcat as a backend for something else is the shell-script
300Web browser, which simply asks for the relevant parts of a URL and pipes
301"GET /what/ever" into a netcat connection to the server.  I used to do this
302with telnet, and had to use calculated sleep times and other stupidity to
303kludge around telnet's limitations.  Netcat guarantees that I get the whole
304page, and since it transfers all the data unmodified, I can even pull down
305binary image files and display them elsewhere later.  Some folks may find the
306idea of a shell-script web browser silly and strange, but it starts up and
307gets me my info a hell of a lot faster than a GUI browser and doesn't hide
308any contents of links and forms and such.  This is included, as scripts/web,
309along with several other web-related examples.
310
311Netcat is an obvious replacement for telnet as a tool for talking to daemons.
312For example, it is easier to type "nc host 25", talk to someone's mailer, and
313just ^C out than having to type ^]c or QUIT as telnet would require you to do.
314You can quickly catalog the services on your network by telling netcat to
315connect to well-known services and collect greetings, or at least scan for open
316ports.  You'll probably want to collect netcat's diagnostic messages in your
317output files, so be sure to include standard error in the output using
318`>& file' in *csh or `> file 2>&1' in bourne shell.
319
320A scanning example: "echo QUIT | nc -v -w 5 target 20-250 500-600 5990-7000"
321will inform you about a target's various well-known TCP servers, including
322r-services, X, IRC, and maybe a few you didn't expect.  Sending in QUIT and
323using the timeout will almost guarantee that you see some kind of greeting or
324error from each service, which usually indicates what it is and what version.
325[Beware of the "chargen" port, though...]  SATAN uses exactly this technique to
326collect host information, and indeed some of the ideas herein were taken from
327the SATAN backend tools.  If you script this up to try every host in your
328subnet space and just let it run, you will not only see all the services,
329you'll find out about hosts that aren't correctly listed in your DNS.  Then you
330can compare new snapshots against old snapshots to see changes.  For going
331after particular services, a more intrusive example is in scripts/probe.
332
333Netcat can be used as a simple data transfer agent, and it doesn't really
334matter which end is the listener and which end is the client -- input at one
335side arrives at the other side as output.  It is helpful to start the listener
336at the receiving side with no timeout specified, and then give the sending side
337a small timeout.  That way the listener stays listening until you contact it,
338and after data stops flowing the client will time out, shut down, and take the
339listener with it.  Unless the intervening network is fraught with problems,
340this should be completely reliable, and you can always increase the timeout.  A
341typical example of something "rsh" is often used for: on one side,
342
343	nc -l -p 1234 | uncompress -c | tar xvfp -
344
345and then on the other side
346
347	tar cfp - /some/dir | compress -c | nc -w 3 othermachine 1234
348
349will transfer the contents of a directory from one machine to another, without
350having to worry about .rhosts files, user accounts, or inetd configurations
351at either end.  Again, it matters not which is the listener or receiver; the
352"tarring" machine could just as easily be running the listener instead.  One
353could conceivably use a scheme like this for backups, by having cron-jobs fire
354up listeners and backup handlers [which can be restricted to specific addresses
355and ports between each other] and pipe "dump" or "tar" on one machine to "dd
356of=/dev/tapedrive" on another as usual.  Since netcat returns a nonzero exit
357status for a denied listener connection, scripts to handle such tasks could
358easily log and reject connect attempts from third parties, and then retry.
359
360Another simple data-transfer example: shipping things to a PC that doesn't have
361any network applications yet except a TCP stack and a web browser.  Point the
362browser at an arbitrary port on a Unix server by telling it to download
363something like http://unixbox:4444/foo, and have a listener on the Unix side
364ready to ship out a file when the connect comes in.  The browser may pervert
365binary data when told to save the URL, but you can dig the raw data out of
366the on-disk cache.
367
368If you build netcat with GAPING_SECURITY_HOLE defined, you can use it as an
369"inetd" substitute to test experimental network servers that would otherwise
370run under "inetd".  A script or program will have its input and output hooked
371to the network the same way, perhaps sans some fancier signal handling.  Given
372that most network services do not bind to a particular local address, whether
373they are under "inetd" or not, it is possible for netcat avoid the "address
374already in use" error by binding to a specific address.  This lets you [as
375root, for low ports] place netcat "in the way" of a standard service, since
376inbound connections are generally sent to such specifically-bound listeners
377first and fall back to the ones bound to "any".  This allows for a one-off
378experimental simulation of some service, without having to screw around with
379inetd.conf.  Running with -v turned on and collecting a connection log from
380standard error is recommended.
381
382Netcat as well can make an outbound connection and then run a program or script
383on the originating end, with input and output connected to the same network
384port.  This "inverse inetd" capability could enhance the backup-server concept
385described above or help facilitate things such as a "network dialback" concept.
386The possibilities are many and varied here; if such things are intended as
387security mechanisms, it may be best to modify netcat specifically for the
388purpose instead of wrapping such functions in scripts.
389
390Speaking of inetd, netcat will function perfectly well *under* inetd as a TCP
391connection redirector for inbound services, like a "plug-gw" without the
392authentication step.  This is very useful for doing stuff like redirecting
393traffic through your firewall out to other places like web servers and mail
394hubs, while posing no risk to the firewall machine itself.  Put netcat behind
395inetd and tcp_wrappers, perhaps thusly:
396
397	www stream tcp nowait nobody /etc/tcpd /bin/nc -w 3 realwww 80
398
399and you have a simple and effective "application relay" with access control
400and logging.  Note use of the wait time as a "safety" in case realwww isn't
401reachable or the calling user aborts the connection -- otherwise the relay may
402hang there forever.
403
404You can use netcat to generate huge amounts of useless network data for
405various performance testing.  For example, doing
406
407	yes AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA | nc -v -v -l -p 2222 > /dev/null
408
409on one side and then hitting it with
410
411	yes BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | nc othermachine 2222 > /dev/null
412
413from another host will saturate your wires with A's and B's.  The "very
414verbose" switch usage will tell you how many of each were sent and received
415after you interrupt either side.  Using UDP mode produces tremendously MORE
416trash per unit time in the form of fragmented 8 Kbyte mobygrams -- enough to
417stress-test kernels and network interfaces.  Firing random binary data into
418various network servers may help expose bugs in their input handling, which
419nowadays is a popular thing to explore.  A simple example data-generator is
420given in data/data.c included in this package, along with a small collection
421of canned input files to generate various packet contents.  This program is
422documented in its beginning comments, but of interest here is using "%r" to
423generate random bytes at well-chosen points in a data stream.  If you can
424crash your daemon, you likely have a security problem.
425
426The hex dump feature may be useful for debugging odd network protocols,
427especially if you don't have any network monitoring equipment handy or aren't
428root where you'd need to run "tcpdump" or something.  Bind a listening netcat
429to a local port, and have it run a script which in turn runs another netcat
430to the real service and captures the hex dump to a log file.  This sets up a
431transparent relay between your local port and wherever the real service is.
432Be sure that the script-run netcat does *not* use -v, or the extra info it
433sends to standard error may confuse the protocol.  Note also that you cannot
434have the "listen/exec" netcat do the data capture, since once the connection
435arrives it is no longer netcat that is running.
436
437Binding to an arbitrary local port allows you to simulate things like r-service
438clients, if you are root locally.  For example, feeding "^@root^@joe^@pwd^@"
439[where ^@ is a null, and root/joe could be any other local/remote username
440pair] into a "rsh" or "rlogin" server, FROM your port 1023 for example,
441duplicates what the server expects to receive.  Thus, you can test for insecure
442.rhosts files around your network without having to create new user accounts on
443your client machine.  The program data/rservice.c can aid this process by
444constructing the "rcmd" protocol bytes.  Doing this also prevents "rshd" from
445trying to create that separate standard-error socket and still gives you an
446input path, as opposed to the usual action of "rsh -n".  Using netcat for
447things like this can be really useful sometimes, because rsh and rlogin
448generally want a host *name* as an argument and won't accept IP addresses.  If
449your client-end DNS is hosed, as may be true when you're trying to extract
450backup sets on to a dumb client, "netcat -n" wins where normal rsh/rlogin is
451useless.
452
453If you are unsure that a remote syslogger is working, test it with netcat.
454Make a UDP connection to port 514 and type in "<0>message", which should
455correspond to "kern.emerg" and cause syslogd to scream into every file it has
456open [and possibly all over users' terminals].  You can tame this down by
457using a different number and use netcat inside routine scripts to send syslog
458messages to places that aren't configured in syslog.conf.  For example,
459"echo '<38>message' | nc -w 1 -u loggerhost 514" should send to auth.notice
460on loggerhost.  The exact number may vary; check against your syslog.h first.
461
462Netcat provides several ways for you to test your own packet filters.  If you
463bind to a port normally protected against outside access and make a connection
464to somewhere outside your own network, the return traffic will be coming to
465your chosen port from the "outside" and should be blocked.  TCP may get through
466if your filter passes all "ack syn", but it shouldn't be even doing that to low
467ports on your network.  Remember to test with UDP traffic as well!  If your
468filter passes at least outbound source-routed IP packets, bouncing a connection
469back to yourself via some gateway outside your network will create "incoming"
470traffic with your source address, which should get dropped by a correctly
471configured anti-spoofing filter.  This is a "non-test" if you're also dropping
472source-routing, but it's good to be able to test for that too.  Any packet
473filter worth its salt will be blocking source-routed packets in both
474directions, but you never know what interesting quirks you might turn up by
475playing around with source ports and addresses and watching the wires with a
476network monitor.
477
478You can use netcat to protect your own workstation's X server against outside
479access.  X is stupid enough to listen for connections on "any" and never tell
480you when new connections arrive, which is one reason it is so vulnerable.  Once
481you have all your various X windows up and running you can use netcat to bind
482just to your ethernet address and listen to port 6000.  Any new connections
483from outside the machine will hit netcat instead your X server, and you get a
484log of who's trying.  You can either tell netcat to drop the connection, or
485perhaps run another copy of itself to relay to your actual X server on
486"localhost".  This may not work for dedicated X terminals, but it may be
487possible to authorize your X terminal only for its boot server, and run a relay
488netcat over on the server that will in turn talk to your X terminal.  Since
489netcat only handles one listening connection per run, make sure that whatever
490way you rig it causes another one to run and listen on 6000 soon afterward, or
491your real X server will be reachable once again.  A very minimal script just
492to protect yourself could be
493
494	while true ; do
495	  nc -v -l -s <your-addr> -p 6000 localhost 2
496	done
497
498which causes netcat to accept and then close any inbound connection to your
499workstation's normal ethernet address, and another copy is immediately run by
500the script.  Send standard error to a file for a log of connection attempts.
501If your system can't do the "specific bind" thing all is not lost; run your
502X server on display ":1" or port 6001, and netcat can still function as a probe
503alarm by listening on 6000.
504
505Does your shell-account provider allow personal Web pages, but not CGI scripts?
506You can have netcat listen on a particular port to execute a program or script
507of your choosing, and then just point to the port with a URL in your homepage.
508The listener could even exist on a completely different machine, avoiding the
509potential ire of the homepage-host administrators.  Since the script will get
510the raw browser query as input it won't look like a typical CGI script, and
511since it's running under your UID you need to write it carefully.  You may want
512to write a netcat-based script as a wrapper that reads a query and sets up
513environment variables for a regular CGI script.  The possibilities for using
514netcat and scripts to handle Web stuff are almost endless.  Again, see the
515examples under scripts/.
516
517Example uses -- the dark side
518=============================
519
520Equal time is deserved here, since a versatile tool like this can be useful
521to any Shade of Hat.  I could use my Victorinox to either fix your car or
522disassemble it, right?  You can clearly use something like netcat to attack
523or defend -- I don't try to govern anyone's social outlook, I just build tools.
524Regardless of your intentions, you should still be aware of these threats to
525your own systems.
526
527The first obvious thing is scanning someone *else's* network for vulnerable
528services.  Files containing preconstructed data, be it exploratory or
529exploitive, can be fed in as standard input, including command-line arguments
530to netcat itself to keep "ps" ignorant of your doings.  The more random the
531scanning, the less likelihood of detection by humans, scan-detectors, or
532dynamic filtering, and with -i you'll wait longer but avoid loading down the
533target's network.  Some examples for crafting various standard UDP probes are
534given in data/*.d.
535
536Some configurations of packet filters attempt to solve the FTP-data problem by
537just allowing such connections from the outside.  These come FROM port 20, TO
538high TCP ports inside -- if you locally bind to port 20, you may find yourself
539able to bypass filtering in some cases.  Maybe not to low ports "inside", but
540perhaps to TCP NFS servers, X servers, Prospero, ciscos that listen on 200x
541and 400x...  Similar bypassing may be possible for UDP [and maybe TCP too] if a
542connection comes from port 53; a filter may assume it's a nameserver response.
543
544Using -e in conjunction with binding to a specific address can enable "server
545takeover" by getting in ahead of the real ones, whereupon you can snarf data
546sent in and feed your own back out.  At the very least you can log a hex dump
547of someone else's session.  If you are root, you can certainly use -s and -e to
548run various hacked daemons without having to touch inetd.conf or the real
549daemons themselves.  You may not always have the root access to deal with low
550ports, but what if you are on a machine that also happens to be an NFS server?
551You might be able to collect some interesting things from port 2049, including
552local file handles.  There are several other servers that run on high ports
553that are likely candidates for takeover, including many of the RPC services on
554some platforms [yppasswdd, anyone?].  Kerberos tickets, X cookies, and IRC
555traffic also come to mind.  RADIUS-based terminal servers connect incoming
556users to shell-account machines on a high port, usually 1642 or thereabouts.
557SOCKS servers run on 1080.  Do "netstat -a" and get creative.
558
559There are some daemons that are well-written enough to bind separately to all
560the local interfaces, possibly with an eye toward heading off this sort of
561problem.  Named from recent BIND releases, and NTP, are two that come to mind.
562Netstat will show these listening on address.53 instead of *.53.  You won't
563be able to get in front of these on any of the real interface addresses, which
564of course is especially interesting in the case of named, but these servers
565sometimes forget about things like "alias" interface addresses or interfaces
566that appear later on such as dynamic PPP links.  There are some hacked web
567servers and versions of "inetd" floating around that specifically bind as well,
568based on a configuration file -- these generally *are* bound to alias addresses
569to offer several different address-based services from one machine.
570
571Using -e to start a remote backdoor shell is another obvious sort of thing,
572easier than constructing a file for inetd to listen on "ingreslock" or
573something, and you can access-control it against other people by specifying a
574client host and port.  Experience with this truly demonstrates how fragile the
575barrier between being "logged in" or not really is, and is further expressed by
576scripts/bsh.  If you're already behind a firewall, it may be easier to make an
577*outbound* connection and then run a shell; a small wrapper script can
578periodically try connecting to a known place and port, you can later listen
579there until the inbound connection arrives, and there's your shell.  Running
580a shell via UDP has several interesting features, although be aware that once
581"connected", the UDP stub sockets tend to show up in "netstat" just like TCP
582connections and may not be quite as subtle as you wanted.  Packets may also be
583lost, so use TCP if you need reliable connections.  But since UDP is
584connectionless, a hookup of this sort will stick around almost forever, even if
585you ^C out of netcat or do a reboot on your side, and you only need to remember
586the ports you used on both ends to reestablish.  And outbound UDP-plus-exec
587connection creates the connected socket and starts the program immediately.  On
588a listening UDP connection, the socket is created once a first packet is
589received.  In either case, though, such a "connection" has the interesting side
590effect that only your client-side IP address and [chosen?] source port will
591thereafter be able to talk to it.  Instant access control!  A non-local third
592party would have to do ALL of the following to take over such a session:
593
594	forge UDP with your source address [trivial to do; see below]
595	guess the port numbers of BOTH ends, or sniff the wire for them
596	arrange to block ICMP or UDP return traffic between it and your real
597	  source, so the session doesn't die with a network write error.
598
599The companion program data/rservice.c is helpful in scripting up any sort of
600r-service username or password guessing attack.  The arguments to "rservice"
601are simply the strings that get null-terminated and passed over an "rcmd"-style
602connection, with the assumption that the client does not need a separate
603standard-error port.  Brute-force password banging is best done via "rexec" if
604it is available since it is less likely to log failed attempts.  Thus, doing
605"rservice joe joespass pwd | nc target exec" should return joe's home dir if
606the password is right, or "Permission denied."  Plug in a dictionary and go to
607town.  If you're attacking rsh/rlogin, remember to be root and bind to a port
608between 512 and 1023 on your end, and pipe in "rservice joe joe pwd" and such.
609
610Netcat can prevent inadvertently sending extra information over a telnet
611connection.  Use "nc -t" in place of telnet, and daemons that try to ask for
612things like USER and TERM environment variables will get no useful answers, as
613they otherwise would from a more recent telnet program.  Some telnetds actually
614try to collect this stuff and then plug the USER variable into "login" so that
615the caller is then just asked for a password!  This mechanism could cause a
616login attempt as YOUR real username to be logged over there if you use a
617Borman-based telnet instead of "nc -t".
618
619Got an unused network interface configured in your kernel [e.g. SLIP], or
620support for alias addresses?  Ifconfig one to be any address you like, and bind
621to it with -s to enable all sorts of shenanigans with bogus source addresses.
622The interface probably has to be UP before this works; some SLIP versions
623need a far-end address before this is true.  Hammering on UDP services is then
624a no-brainer.  What you can do to an unfiltered syslog daemon should be fairly
625obvious; trimming the conf file can help protect against it.  Many routers out
626there still blindly believe what they receive via RIP and other routing
627protocols.  Although most UDP echo and chargen servers check if an incoming
628packet was sent from *another* "internal" UDP server, there are many that still
629do not, any two of which [or many, for that matter] could keep each other
630entertained for hours at the expense of bandwidth.  And you can always make
631someone wonder why she's being probed by nsa.gov.
632
633Your TCP spoofing possibilities are mostly limited to destinations you can
634source-route to while locally bound to your phony address.  Many sites block
635source-routed packets these days for precisely this reason.  If your kernel
636does oddball things when sending source-routed packets, try moving the pointer
637around with -G.  You may also have to fiddle with the routing on your own
638machine before you start receiving packets back.  Warning: some machines still
639send out traffic using the source address of the outbound interface, regardless
640of your binding, especially in the case of localhost.  Check first.  If you can
641open a connection but then get no data back from it, the target host is
642probably killing the IP options on its end [this is an option inside TCP
643wrappers and several other packages], which happens after the 3-way handshake
644is completed.  If you send some data and observe the "send-q" side of "netstat"
645for that connection increasing but never getting sent, that's another symptom.
646Beware: if Sendmail 8.7.x detects a source-routed SMTP connection, it extracts
647the hop list and sticks it in the Received: header!
648
649SYN bombing [sometimes called "hosing"] can disable many TCP servers, and if
650you hit one often enough, you can keep it unreachable for days.  As is true of
651many other denial-of-service attacks, there is currently no defense against it
652except maybe at the human level.  Making kernel SOMAXCONN considerably larger
653than the default and the half-open timeout smaller can help, and indeed some
654people running large high-performance web servers have *had* to do that just to
655handle normal traffic.  Taking out mailers and web servers is sociopathic, but
656on the other hand it is sometimes useful to be able to, say, disable a site's
657identd daemon for a few minutes.  If someone realizes what is going on,
658backtracing will still be difficult since the packets have a phony source
659address, but calls to enough ISP NOCs might eventually pinpoint the source.
660It is also trivial for a clueful ISP to watch for or even block outgoing
661packets with obviously fake source addresses, but as we know many of them are
662not clueful or willing to get involved in such hassles.  Besides, outbound
663packets with an [otherwise unreachable] source address in one of their net
664blocks would look fairly legitimate.
665
666Notes
667=====
668
669A discussion of various caveats, subtleties, and the design of the innards.
670
671As of version 1.07 you can construct a single file containing command arguments
672and then some data to transfer.  Netcat is now smart enough to pick out the
673first line and build the argument list, and send any remaining data across the
674net to one or multiple ports.  The first release of netcat had trouble with
675this -- it called fgets() for the command line argument, which behind the
676scenes does a large read() from standard input, perhaps 4096 bytes or so, and
677feeds that out to the fgets() library routine.  By the time netcat 1.00 started
678directly read()ing stdin for more data, 4096 bytes of it were gone.  It now
679uses raw read() everywhere and does the right thing whether reading from files,
680pipes, or ttys.  If you use this for multiple-port connections, the single
681block of data will now be a maximum of 8K minus the first line.  Improvements
682have been made to the logic in sending the saved chunk to each new port.  Note
683that any command-line arguments hidden using this mechanism could still be
684extracted from a core dump.
685
686When netcat receives an inbound UDP connection, it creates a "connected socket"
687back to the source of the connection so that it can also send out data using
688normal write().  Using this mechanism instead of recvfrom/sendto has several
689advantages -- the read/write select loop is simplified, and ICMP errors can in
690effect be received by non-root users.  However, it has the subtle side effect
691that if further UDP packets arrive from the caller but from different source
692ports, the listener will not receive them.  UDP listen mode on a multihomed
693machine may have similar quirks unless you specifically bind to one of its
694addresses.  It is not clear that kernel support for UDP connected sockets
695and/or my understanding of it is entirely complete here, so experiment...
696
697You should be aware of some subtleties concerning UDP scanning.  If -z is on,
698netcat attempts to send a single null byte to the target port, twice, with a
699small time in between.  You can either use the -w timeout, or netcat will try
700to make a "sideline" TCP connection to the target to introduce a small time
701delay equal to the round-trip time between you and the target.  Note that if
702you have a -w timeout and -i timeout set, BOTH take effect and you wait twice
703as long.  The TCP connection is to a normally refused port to minimize traffic,
704but if you notice a UDP fast-scan taking somewhat longer than it should, it
705could be that the target is actually listening on the TCP port.  Either way,
706any ICMP port-unreachable messages from the target should have arrived in the
707meantime.  The second single-byte UDP probe is then sent.  Under BSD kernels,
708the ICMP error is delivered to the "connected socket" and the second write
709returns an error, which tells netcat that there is NOT a UDP service there.
710While Linux seems to be a fortunate exception, under many SYSV derived kernels
711the ICMP is not delivered, and netcat starts reporting that *all* the ports are
712"open" -- clearly wrong.  [Some systems may not even *have* the "udp connected
713socket" concept, and netcat in its current form will not work for UDP at all.]
714If -z is specified and only one UDP port is probed, netcat's exit status
715reflects whether the connection was "open" or "refused" as with TCP.
716
717It may also be that UDP packets are being blocked by filters with no ICMP error
718returns, in which case everything will time out and return "open".  This all
719sounds backwards, but that's how UDP works.  If you're not sure, try "echo
720w00gumz | nc -u -w 2 target 7" to see if you can reach its UDP echo port at
721all.  You should have no trouble using a BSD-flavor system to scan for UDP
722around your own network, although flooding a target with the high activity that
723-z generates will cause it to occasionally drop packets and indicate false
724"opens".  A more "correct" way to do this is collect and analyze the ICMP
725errors, as does SATAN's "udp_scan" backend, but then again there's no guarantee
726that the ICMP gets back to you either.  Udp_scan also does the zero-byte
727probes but is excruciatingly careful to calculate its own round-trip timing
728average and dynamically set its own response timeouts along with decoding any
729ICMP received.  Netcat uses a much sleazier method which is nonetheless quite
730effective.  Cisco routers are known to have a "dead time" in between ICMP
731responses about unreachable UDP ports, so a fast scan of a cisco will show
732almost everything "open".  If you are looking for a specific UDP service, you
733can construct a file containing the right bytes to trigger a response from the
734other end and send that as standard input.  Netcat will read up to 8K of the
735file and send the same data to every UDP port given.  Note that you must use a
736timeout in this case [as would any other UDP client application] since the
737two-write probe only happens if -z is specified.
738
739Many telnet servers insist on a specific set of option negotiations before
740presenting a login banner.  On a raw connection you will see this as small
741amount of binary gook.  My attempts to create fixed input bytes to make a
742telnetd happy worked some places but failed against newer BSD-flavor ones,
743possibly due to timing problems, but there are a couple of much better
744workarounds.  First, compile with -DTELNET and use -t if you just want to get
745past the option negotiation and talk to something on a telnet port.  You will
746still see the binary gook -- in fact you'll see a lot more of it as the options
747are responded to behind the scenes.  The telnet responder does NOT update the
748total byte count, or show up in the hex dump -- it just responds negatively to
749any options read from the incoming data stream.  If you want to use a normal
750full-blown telnet to get to something but also want some of netcat's features
751involved like settable ports or timeouts, construct a tiny "foo" script:
752
753	#! /bin/sh
754	exec nc -otheroptions targethost 23
755
756and then do
757
758	nc -l -p someport -e foo localhost &
759	telnet localhost someport
760
761and your telnet should connect transparently through the exec'ed netcat to
762the target, using whatever options you supplied in the "foo" script.  Don't
763use -t inside the script, or you'll wind up sending *two* option responses.
764
765I've observed inconsistent behavior under some Linuxes [perhaps just older
766ones?] when binding in listen mode.  Sometimes netcat binds only to "localhost"
767if invoked with no address or port arguments, and sometimes it is unable to
768bind to a specific address for listening if something else is already listening
769on "any".  The former problem can be worked around by specifying "-s 0.0.0.0",
770which will do the right thing despite netcat claiming that it's listening on
771[127.0.0.1].  This is a known problem -- for example, there's a mention of it
772in the makefile for SOCKS.  On the flip side, binding to localhost and sending
773packets to some other machine doesn't work as you'd expect -- they go out with
774the source address of the sending interface instead.  The Linux kernel contains
775a specific check to ensure that packets from 127.0.0.1 are never sent to the
776wire; other kernels may contain similar code.  Linux, of course, *still*
777doesn't support source-routing, but they claim that it and many other network
778improvements are at least breathing hard.
779
780There are several possible errors associated with making TCP connections, but
781to specifically see anything other than "refused", one must wait the full
782kernel-defined timeout for a connection to fail.  Netcat's mechanism of
783wrapping an alarm timer around the connect prevents the *real* network error
784from being returned -- "errno" at that point indicates "interrupted system
785call" since the connect attempt was interrupted.  Some old 4.3 BSD kernels
786would actually return things like "host unreachable" immediately if that was
787the case, but most newer kernels seem to wait the full timeout and *then* pass
788back the real error.  Go figure.  In this case, I'd argue that the old way was
789better, despite those same kernels generally being the ones that tear down
790*established* TCP connections when ICMP-bombed.
791
792Incoming socket options are passed to applications by the kernel in the
793kernel's own internal format.  The socket-options structure for source-routing
794contains the "first-hop" IP address first, followed by the rest of the real
795options list.  The kernel uses this as is when sending reply packets -- the
796structure is therefore designed to be more useful to the kernel than to humans,
797but the hex dump of it that netcat produces is still useful to have.
798
799Kernels treat source-routing options somewhat oddly, but it sort of makes sense
800once one understands what's going on internally.  The options list of addresses
801must contain hop1, hop2, ..., destination.  When a source-routed packet is sent
802by the kernel [at least BSD], the actual destination address becomes irrelevant
803because it is replaced with "hop1", "hop1" is removed from the options list,
804and all the other addresses in the list are shifted up to fill the hole.  Thus
805the outbound packet is sent from your chosen source address to the first
806*gateway*, and the options list now contains hop2, ..., destination.  During
807all this address shuffling, the kernel does NOT change the pointer value, which
808is why it is useful to be able to set the pointer yourself -- you can construct
809some really bizarre return paths, and send your traffic fairly directly to the
810target but around some larger loop on the way back.  Some Sun kernels seem to
811never flip the source-route around if it contains less than three hops, never
812reset the pointer anyway, and tries to send the packet [with options containing
813a "completed" source route!!] directly back to the source.  This is way broken,
814of course.  [Maybe ipforwarding has to be on?  I haven't had an opportunity to
815beat on it thoroughly yet.]
816
817"Credits" section: The original idea for netcat fell out of a long-standing
818desire and fruitless search for a tool resembling it and having the same
819features.  After reading some other network code and realizing just how many
820cool things about sockets could be controlled by the calling user, I started
821on the basics and the rest fell together pretty quickly.  Some port-scanning
822ideas were taken from Venema/Farmer's SATAN tool kit, and Pluvius' "pscan"
823utility.  Healthy amounts of BSD kernel source were perused in an attempt to
824dope out socket options and source-route handling; additional help was obtained
825from Dave Borman's telnet sources.  The select loop is loosely based on fairly
826well-known code from "rsh" and Richard Stevens' "sock" program [which itself is
827sort of a "netcat" with more obscure features], with some more paranoid
828sanity-checking thrown in to guard against the distinct likelihood that there
829are subtleties about such things I still don't understand.  I found the
830argument-hiding method cleanly implemented in Barrett's "deslogin"; reading the
831line as input allows greater versatility and is much less prone to cause
832bizarre problems than the more common trick of overwriting the argv array.
833After the first release, several people contributed portability fixes; they are
834credited in generic.h and the Makefile.  Lauren Burka inspired the ascii art
835for this revised document.  Dean Gaudet at Wired supplied a precursor to
836the hex-dump code, and mudge@l0pht.com originally experimented with and
837supplied code for the telnet-options responder.  Outbound "-e <prog>" resulted
838from a need to quietly bypass a firewall installation.  Other suggestions and
839patches have rolled in for which I am always grateful, but there are only 26
840hours per day and a discussion of feature creep near the end of this document.
841
842Netcat was written with the Russian railroad in mind -- conservatively built
843and solid, but it *will* get you there.  While the coding style is fairly
844"tight", I have attempted to present it cleanly [keeping *my* lines under 80
845characters, dammit] and put in plenty of comments as to why certain things
846are done.  Items I know to be questionable are clearly marked with "XXX".
847Source code was made to be modified, but determining where to start is
848difficult with some of the tangles of spaghetti code that are out there.
849Here are some of the major points I feel are worth mentioning about netcat's
850internal design, whether or not you agree with my approach.
851
852Except for generic.h, which changes to adapt more platforms, netcat is a single
853source file.  This has the distinct advantage of only having to include headers
854once and not having to re-declare all my functions in a billion different
855places.  I have attempted to contain all the gross who's-got-what-.h-file
856things in one small dumping ground.  Functions are placed "dependencies-first",
857such that when the compiler runs into the calls later, it already knows the
858type and arguments and won't complain.  No function prototyping -- not even the
859__P(()) crock -- is used, since it is more portable and a file of this size is
860easy enough to check manually.  Each function has a standard-format comment
861ahead of it, which is easily found using the regexp " :$".  I freely use gotos.
862Loops and if-clauses are made as small and non-nested as possible, and the ends
863of same *marked* for clarity [I wish everyone would do this!!].
864
865Large structures and buffers are all malloc()ed up on the fly, slightly larger
866than the size asked for and zeroed out.  This reduces the chances of damage
867from those "end of the buffer" fencepost errors or runaway pointers escaping
868off the end.  These things are permanent per run, so nothing needs to be freed
869until the program exits.
870
871File descriptor zero is always expected to be standard input, even if it is
872closed.  If a new network descriptor winds up being zero, a different one is
873asked for which will be nonzero, and fd zero is simply left kicking around
874for the rest of the run.  Why?  Because everything else assumes that stdin is
875always zero and "netfd" is always positive.  This may seem silly, but it was a
876lot easier to code.  The new fd is obtained directly as a new socket, because
877trying to simply dup() a new fd broke subsequent socket-style use of the new fd
878under Solaris' stupid streams handling in the socket library.
879
880The catch-all message and error handlers are implemented with an ample list of
881phoney arguments to get around various problems with varargs.  Varargs seems
882like deliberate obfuscation in the first place, and using it would also
883require use of vfprintf() which not all platforms support.  The trailing
884sleep in bail() is to allow output to flush, which is sometimes needed if
885netcat is already on the other end of a network connection.
886
887The reader may notice that the section that does DNS lookups seems much
888gnarlier and more confusing than other parts.  This is NOT MY FAULT.  The
889sockaddr and hostent abstractions are an abortion that forces the coder to
890deal with it.  Then again, a lot of BSD kernel code looks like similar
891struct-pointer hell.  I try to straighten it out somewhat by defining my own
892HINF structure, containing names, ascii-format IP addresses, and binary IP
893addresses.  I fill this structure exactly once per host argument, and squirrel
894everything safely away and handy for whatever wants to reference it later.
895
896Where many other network apps use the FIONBIO ioctl to set non-blocking I/O
897on network sockets, netcat uses straightforward blocking I/O everywhere.
898This makes everything very lock-step, relying on the network and filesystem
899layers to feed in data when needed.  Data read in is completely written out
900before any more is fetched.  This may not be quite the right thing to do under
901some OSes that don't do timed select() right, but this remains to be seen.
902
903The hexdump routine is written to be as fast as possible, which is why it does
904so much work itself instead of just sprintf()ing everything together.  Each
905dump line is built into a single buffer and atomically written out using the
906lowest level I/O calls.  Further improvements could undoubtedly be made by
907using writev() and eliminating all sprintf()s, but it seems to fly right along
908as is.  If both exec-a-prog mode and a hexdump file is asked for, the hexdump
909flag is deliberately turned off to avoid creating random zero-length files.
910Files are opened in "truncate" mode; if you want "append" mode instead, change
911the open flags in main().
912
913main() may look a bit hairy, but that's only because it has to go down the
914argv list and handle multiple ports, random mode, and exit status.  Efforts
915have been made to place a minimum of code inside the getopt() loop.  Any real
916work is sent off to functions in what is hopefully a straightforward way.
917
918Obligatory vendor-bash: If "nc" had become a standard utility years ago,
919the commercial vendors would have likely packaged it setuid root and with
920-DGAPING_SECURITY_HOLE turned on but not documented.  It is hoped that netcat
921will aid people in finding and fixing the no-brainer holes of this sort that
922keep appearing, by allowing easier experimentation with the "bare metal" of
923the network layer.
924
925It could be argued that netcat already has too many features.  I have tried
926to avoid "feature creep" by limiting netcat's base functionality only to those
927things which are truly relevant to making network connections and the everyday
928associated DNS lossage we're used to.  Option switches already have slightly
929overloaded functionality.  Random port mode is sort of pushing it.  The
930hex-dump feature went in later because it *is* genuinely useful.  The
931telnet-responder code *almost* verges on the gratuitous, especially since it
932mucks with the data stream, and is left as an optional piece.  Many people have
933asked for example "how 'bout adding encryption?" and my response is that such
934things should be separate entities that could pipe their data *through* netcat
935instead of having their own networking code.  I am therefore not completely
936enthusiastic about adding any more features to this thing, although you are
937still free to send along any mods you think are useful.
938
939Nonetheless, at this point I think of netcat as my tcp/ip swiss army knife,
940and the numerous companion programs and scripts to go with it as duct tape.
941Duct tape of course has a light side and a dark side and binds the universe
942together, and if I wrap enough of it around what I'm trying to accomplish,
943it *will* work.  Alternatively, if netcat is a large hammer, there are many
944network protocols that are increasingly looking like nails by now...
945
946_H* 960320 v1.10 RELEASE -- happy spring!
947

README.cryptcat

1cryptcat = netcat + encryption
2
3Cryptcat is the standard netcat enhanced with twofish encryption.
4
5Twofish is courtesy of counterpane, and cryptix. We started with the
6Java version of twofish from cryptix, converted it to C++ (don't ask why),
7and enhanced it by adding CBC mode and the ciphertext stealing technique
8from Applied Cryptography (pg. 196)
9
10How do you use it?
11
12  Machine A: cryptcat -l -p 1234 < testfile
13  Machine B: cryptcat <machine A IP> 1234
14
15This is identical to the normal netcat options for doing exactly the
16same thing.  However, in this case the data transferred is encrypted.
17
18Known issues:
19It is known that linux will throw errors like:
20/tmp/ccF9UdJx.o(.text+0x6d0): In function `getportpoop': :
21warning: Using 'getservbyname' in statically linked applications
22requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version
23used for linking /tmp/ccF9UdJx.o(.text+0x61f): In function
24getportpoop': : warning: Using 'getservbyport' in statically
25linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from
26the glibc version used for linking
27
28This is due to using -static which either Hobbit or someone else
29insists in the Makefile is The Right Thing(tm). The compiled code
30still seems to run without an issue and according to ldd it is a
31static binary.
32
33
34Changes -- been putting these in Changelog file...
35
36Since release alot of people have been submitting changes (many times
37for the same thing).  I've been doing my best to keep up, we are trying
38to get this up on sourceforge, but there seems to be some sort of
39"approval" process that makes it unclear if that will actually happen.
40
41So, if you have submitted something, and its not here, let me know.  If you've
42submitted a change, and its here with someone else's name, that just means
43someone else got the same change in before you.
44
45If you have a change, let me know what name if any to include with
46the change.
47