lockdep: Fix block chain corruption

Kent reported an occasional KASAN splat in lockdep. Mark then noted:

> I suspect the dodgy access is to chain_block_buckets[-1], which hits the last 4
> bytes of

lockdep: Fix block chain corruption

Kent reported an occasional KASAN splat in lockdep. Mark then noted:

> I suspect the dodgy access is to chain_block_buckets[-1], which hits the last 4
> bytes of the redzone and gets (incorrectly/misleadingly) attributed to
> nr_large_chain_blocks.

That would mean @size == 0, at which point size_to_bucket() returns -1
and the above happens.

alloc_chain_hlocks() has 'size - req', for the first with the
precondition 'size >= rq', which allows the 0.

This code is trying to split a block, del_chain_block() takes what we
need, and add_chain_block() puts back the remainder, except in the
above case the remainder is 0 sized and things go sideways.

Fixes: 810507fe6fd5 ("locking/lockdep: Reuse freed chain_hlocks entries")
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231121114126.GH8262@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net

show more ...

lockdep: fix static memory detection even more

On the parisc architecture, lockdep reports for all static objects which
are in the __initdata section (e.g. "setup_done" in devtmpfs,
"kthreadd_done"

lockdep: fix static memory detection even more

On the parisc architecture, lockdep reports for all static objects which
are in the __initdata section (e.g. "setup_done" in devtmpfs,
"kthreadd_done" in init/main.c) this warning:

INFO: trying to register non-static key.

The warning itself is wrong, because those objects are in the __initdata
section, but the section itself is on parisc outside of range from
_stext to _end, which is why the static_obj() functions returns a wrong
answer.

While fixing this issue, I noticed that the whole existing check can
be simplified a lot.
Instead of checking against the _stext and _end symbols (which include
code areas too) just check for the .data and .bss segments (since we check a
data object). This can be done with the existing is_kernel_core_data()
macro.

In addition objects in the __initdata section can be checked with
init_section_contains(), and is_kernel_rodata() allows keys to be in the
_ro_after_init section.

This partly reverts and simplifies commit bac59d18c701 ("x86/setup: Fix static
memory detection").

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ZNqrLRaOi/3wPAdp@p100
Fixes: bac59d18c701 ("x86/setup: Fix static memory detection")
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

lockdep: Add lock_set_cmp_fn() annotation

This implements a new interface to lockdep, lock_set_cmp_fn(), for
defining a custom ordering when taking multiple locks of the same
class.

This is an alte

lockdep: Add lock_set_cmp_fn() annotation

This implements a new interface to lockdep, lock_set_cmp_fn(), for
defining a custom ordering when taking multiple locks of the same
class.

This is an alternative to subclasses, but can not fully replace them
since subclasses allow lock hierarchies with other clasees
inter-twined, while this relies on pure class nesting.

Specifically, if A is our nesting class then:

A/0 <- B <- A/1

Would be a valid lock order with subclasses (each subclass really is a
full class from the validation PoV) but not with this annotation,
which requires all nesting to be consecutive.

Example output:

| ============================================
| WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
| 6.2.0-rc8-00003-g7d81e591ca6a-dirty #15 Not tainted
| --------------------------------------------
| kworker/14:3/938 is trying to acquire lock:
| ffff8880143218c8 (&b->lock l=0 0:2803368){++++}-{3:3}, at: bch_btree_node_get.part.0+0x81/0x2b0
|
| but task is already holding lock:
| ffff8880143de8c8 (&b->lock l=1 1048575:9223372036854775807){++++}-{3:3}, at: __bch_btree_map_nodes+0xea/0x1e0
| and the lock comparison function returns 1:
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
| Possible unsafe locking scenario:
|
| CPU0
| ----
| lock(&b->lock l=1 1048575:9223372036854775807);
| lock(&b->lock l=0 0:2803368);
|
| *** DEADLOCK ***
|
| May be due to missing lock nesting notation
|
| 3 locks held by kworker/14:3/938:
| #0: ffff888005ea9d38 ((wq_completion)bcache){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1ec/0x530
| #1: ffff8880098c3e70 ((work_completion)(&cl->work)#3){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1ec/0x530
| #2: ffff8880143de8c8 (&b->lock l=1 1048575:9223372036854775807){++++}-{3:3}, at: __bch_btree_map_nodes+0xea/0x1e0

[peterz: extended changelog]
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230509195847.1745548-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev

show more ...

debugobjects,locking: Annotate debug_object_fill_pool() wait type violation

There is an explicit wait-type violation in debug_object_fill_pool()
for PREEMPT_RT=n kernels which allows them to more ea

debugobjects,locking: Annotate debug_object_fill_pool() wait type violation

There is an explicit wait-type violation in debug_object_fill_pool()
for PREEMPT_RT=n kernels which allows them to more easily fill the
object pool and reduce the chance of allocation failures.

Lockdep's wait-type checks are designed to check the PREEMPT_RT
locking rules even for PREEMPT_RT=n kernels and object to this, so
create a lockdep annotation to allow this to stand.

Specifically, create a 'lock' type that overrides the inner wait-type
while it is held -- allowing one to temporarily raise it, such that
the violation is hidden.

Reported-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reported-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230429100614.GA1489784@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net

show more ...

locking/lockdep: Improve the deadlock scenario print for sync and read lock

Lock scenario print is always a weak spot of lockdep splats. Improvement
can be made if we rework the dependency search an

locking/lockdep: Improve the deadlock scenario print for sync and read lock

Lock scenario print is always a weak spot of lockdep splats. Improvement
can be made if we rework the dependency search and the error printing.

However without touching the graph search, we can improve a little for
the circular deadlock case, since we have the to-be-added lock
dependency, and know whether these two locks are read/write/sync.

In order to know whether a held_lock is sync or not, a bit was
"stolen" from ->references, which reduce our limit for the same lock
class nesting from 2^12 to 2^11, and it should still be good enough.

Besides, since we now have bit in held_lock for sync, we don't need the
"hardirqoffs being 1" trick, and also we can avoid the __lock_release()
if we jump out of __lock_acquire() before the held_lock stored.

With these changes, a deadlock case evolved with read lock and sync gets
a better print-out from:

[...] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[...]
[...] CPU0 CPU1
[...] ---- ----
[...] lock(srcuA);
[...] lock(srcuB);
[...] lock(srcuA);
[...] lock(srcuB);

to

[...] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[...]
[...] CPU0 CPU1
[...] ---- ----
[...] rlock(srcuA);
[...] lock(srcuB);
[...] lock(srcuA);
[...] sync(srcuB);

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>

show more ...

locking/lockdep: Introduce lock_sync()

Currently, functions like synchronize_srcu() do not have lockdep
annotations resembling those of other write-side locking primitives.
Such annotations might lo

locking/lockdep: Introduce lock_sync()

Currently, functions like synchronize_srcu() do not have lockdep
annotations resembling those of other write-side locking primitives.
Such annotations might look as follows:

lock_acquire();
lock_release();

Such annotations would tell lockdep that synchronize_srcu() acts like
an empty critical section that waits for other (read-side) critical
sections to finish. This would definitely catch some deadlock, but
as pointed out by Paul Mckenney [1], this could also introduce false
positives because of irq-safe/unsafe detection. Of course, there are
tricks could help with this:

might_sleep(); // Existing statement in __synchronize_srcu().
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)) {
local_irq_disable();
lock_acquire();
lock_release();
local_irq_enable();
}

But it would be better for lockdep to provide a separate annonation for
functions like synchronize_srcu(), so that people won't need to repeat
the ugly tricks above.

Therefore introduce lock_sync(), which is simply an lock+unlock
pair with no irq safe/unsafe deadlock check. This works because the
to-be-annontated functions do not create real critical sections, and
there is therefore no way that irq can create extra dependencies.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180412021233.ewncg5jjuzjw3x62@tardis/

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
[ boqun: Fix typos reported by Davidlohr Bueso and Paul E. Mckenney ]
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>

show more ...

cpuidle: lib/bug: Disable rcu_is_watching() during WARN/BUG

In order to avoid WARN/BUG from generating nested or even recursive
warnings, force rcu_is_watching() true during
WARN/lockdep_rcu_suspici

cpuidle: lib/bug: Disable rcu_is_watching() during WARN/BUG

In order to avoid WARN/BUG from generating nested or even recursive
warnings, force rcu_is_watching() true during
WARN/lockdep_rcu_suspicious().

Notably things like unwinding the stack can trigger rcu_dereference()
warnings, which then triggers more unwinding which then triggers more
warnings etc..

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230126151323.408156109@infradead.org

show more ...

locking/lockdep: Print more debug information - report name and key when look_up_lock_class() got confused

Printing this information will be helpful:

------------[ cut here ]------------
Lookin

locking/lockdep: Print more debug information - report name and key when look_up_lock_class() got confused

Printing this information will be helpful:

------------[ cut here ]------------
Looking for class "l2tp_sock" with key l2tp_socket_class, but found a different class "slock-AF_INET6" with the same key
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 14195 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:940 look_up_lock_class+0xcc/0x140
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 14195 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.0.0-rc6-dirty #863
Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006
RIP: 0010:look_up_lock_class+0xcc/0x140

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bd99391e-f787-efe9-5ec6-3c6dc4c587b0@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp

show more ...

context_tracking: Take idle eqs entrypoints over RCU

The RCU dynticks counter is going to be merged into the context tracking
subsystem. Start with moving the idle extended quiescent states
entrypoi

context_tracking: Take idle eqs entrypoints over RCU

The RCU dynticks counter is going to be merged into the context tracking
subsystem. Start with moving the idle extended quiescent states
entrypoints to context tracking. For now those are dumb redirections to
existing RCU calls.

[ paulmck: Apply kernel test robot feedback. ]

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Cc: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Alex Belits <abelits@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>

show more ...

locking/lockdep: Fix lockdep_init_map_*() confusion

Commit dfd5e3f5fe27 ("locking/lockdep: Mark local_lock_t") added yet
another lockdep_init_map_*() variant, but forgot to update all the
existing u

locking/lockdep: Fix lockdep_init_map_*() confusion

Commit dfd5e3f5fe27 ("locking/lockdep: Mark local_lock_t") added yet
another lockdep_init_map_*() variant, but forgot to update all the
existing users of the most complicated version.

This could lead to a loss of lock_type and hence an incorrect report.
Given the relative rarity of both local_lock and these annotations,
this is unlikely to happen in practise, still, best fix things.

Fixes: dfd5e3f5fe27 ("locking/lockdep: Mark local_lock_t")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YqyEDtoan20K0CVD@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net

show more ...

locking/lockdep: Use sched_clock() for random numbers

Since the rewrote of prandom_u32(), in the commit mentioned below, the
function uses sleeping locks which extracing random numbers and filling
t

locking/lockdep: Use sched_clock() for random numbers

Since the rewrote of prandom_u32(), in the commit mentioned below, the
function uses sleeping locks which extracing random numbers and filling
the batch.
This breaks lockdep on PREEMPT_RT because lock_pin_lock() disables
interrupts while calling __lock_pin_lock(). This can't be moved earlier
because the main user of the function (rq_pin_lock()) invokes that
function after disabling interrupts in order to acquire the lock.

The cookie does not require random numbers as its goal is to provide a
random value in order to notice unexpected "unlock + lock" sites.

Use sched_clock() to provide random numbers.

Fixes: a0103f4d86f88 ("random32: use real rng for non-deterministic randomness")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YoNn3pTkm5+QzE5k@linutronix.de

show more ...

kernel/lockdep: move lockdep sysctls to its own file

kernel/sysctl.c is a kitchen sink where everyone leaves their dirty
dishes, this makes it very difficult to maintain.

To help with this maintena

kernel/lockdep: move lockdep sysctls to its own file

kernel/sysctl.c is a kitchen sink where everyone leaves their dirty
dishes, this makes it very difficult to maintain.

To help with this maintenance let's start by moving sysctls to places
where they actually belong. The proc sysctl maintainers do not want to
know what sysctl knobs you wish to add for your own piece of code, we
just care about the core logic.

All filesystem syctls now get reviewed by fs folks. This commit
follows the commit of fs, move the prove_locking and lock_stat sysctls
to its own file, kernel/lockdep.c.

Signed-off-by: tangmeng <tangmeng@uniontech.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>

show more ...

locking: Add lock contention tracepoints

This adds two new lock contention tracepoints like below:

* lock:contention_begin
* lock:contention_end

The lock:contention_begin takes a flags argument

locking: Add lock contention tracepoints

This adds two new lock contention tracepoints like below:

* lock:contention_begin
* lock:contention_end

The lock:contention_begin takes a flags argument to classify locks. I
found it useful to identify what kind of locks it's tracing like if
it's spinning or sleeping, reader-writer lock, real-time, and per-cpu.

Move tracepoint definitions into mutex.c so that we can use them
without lockdep.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220322185709.141236-2-namhyung@kernel.org

show more ...

lockdep: Fix -Wunused-parameter for _THIS_IP_

While looking into a bug related to the compiler's handling of addresses
of labels, I noticed some uses of _THIS_IP_ seemed unused in lockdep.
Drive by

lockdep: Fix -Wunused-parameter for _THIS_IP_

While looking into a bug related to the compiler's handling of addresses
of labels, I noticed some uses of _THIS_IP_ seemed unused in lockdep.
Drive by cleanup.

-Wunused-parameter:
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1383:22: warning: unused parameter 'ip'
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4246:48: warning: unused parameter 'ip'
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4844:19: warning: unused parameter 'ip'

Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220314221909.2027027-1-ndesaulniers@google.com

show more ...

locking/lockdep: Iterate lock_classes directly when reading lockdep files

When dumping lock_classes information via /proc/lockdep, we can't take
the lockdep lock as the lock hold time is indetermina

locking/lockdep: Iterate lock_classes directly when reading lockdep files

When dumping lock_classes information via /proc/lockdep, we can't take
the lockdep lock as the lock hold time is indeterminate. Iterating
over all_lock_classes without holding lock can be dangerous as there
is a slight chance that it may branch off to other lists leading to
infinite loop or even access invalid memory if changes are made to
all_lock_classes list in parallel.

To avoid this problem, iteration of lock classes is now done directly
on the lock_classes array itself. The lock_classes_in_use bitmap is
checked to see if the lock class is being used. To avoid iterating
the full array all the times, a new max_lock_class_idx value is added
to track the maximum lock_class index that is currently being used.

We can theoretically take the lockdep lock for iterating all_lock_classes
when other lockdep files (lockdep_stats and lock_stat) are accessed as
the lock hold time will be shorter for them. For consistency, they are
also modified to iterate the lock_classes array directly.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220211035526.1329503-2-longman@redhat.com

show more ...

lockdep: Correct lock_classes index mapping

A kernel exception was hit when trying to dump /proc/lockdep_chains after
lockdep report "BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!":

Unable to handle kerne

lockdep: Correct lock_classes index mapping

A kernel exception was hit when trying to dump /proc/lockdep_chains after
lockdep report "BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!":

Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00054005450e05c3
...
00054005450e05c3] address between user and kernel address ranges
...
pc : [0xffffffece769b3a8] string+0x50/0x10c
lr : [0xffffffece769ac88] vsnprintf+0x468/0x69c
...
Call trace:
string+0x50/0x10c
vsnprintf+0x468/0x69c
seq_printf+0x8c/0xd8
print_name+0x64/0xf4
lc_show+0xb8/0x128
seq_read_iter+0x3cc/0x5fc
proc_reg_read_iter+0xdc/0x1d4

The cause of the problem is the function lock_chain_get_class() will
shift lock_classes index by 1, but the index don't need to be shifted
anymore since commit 01bb6f0af992 ("locking/lockdep: Change the range
of class_idx in held_lock struct") already change the index to start
from 0.

The lock_classes[-1] located at chain_hlocks array. When printing
lock_classes[-1] after the chain_hlocks entries are modified, the
exception happened.

The output of lockdep_chains are incorrect due to this problem too.

Fixes: f611e8cf98ec ("lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate chainkey")
Signed-off-by: Cheng Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220210105011.21712-1-cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com

show more ...

locking/lockdep: Avoid potential access of invalid memory in lock_class

It was found that reading /proc/lockdep after a lockdep splat may
potentially cause an access to freed memory if lockdep_unreg

locking/lockdep: Avoid potential access of invalid memory in lock_class

It was found that reading /proc/lockdep after a lockdep splat may
potentially cause an access to freed memory if lockdep_unregister_key()
is called after the splat but before access to /proc/lockdep [1]. This
is due to the fact that graph_lock() call in lockdep_unregister_key()
fails after the clearing of debug_locks by the splat process.

After lockdep_unregister_key() is called, the lock_name may be freed
but the corresponding lock_class structure still have a reference to
it. That invalid memory pointer will then be accessed when /proc/lockdep
is read by a user and a use-after-free (UAF) error will be reported if
KASAN is enabled.

To fix this problem, lockdep_unregister_key() is now modified to always
search for a matching key irrespective of the debug_locks state and
zap the corresponding lock class if a matching one is found.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/77f05c15-81b6-bddd-9650-80d5f23fe330@i-love.sakura.ne.jp/

Fixes: 8b39adbee805 ("locking/lockdep: Make lockdep_unregister_key() honor 'debug_locks' again")
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220103023558.1377055-1-longman@redhat.com

show more ...

lockdep: Use memset_startat() helper in reinit_class()

use memset_startat() helper to simplify the code, there is no functional
change in this patch.

Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei

lockdep: Use memset_startat() helper in reinit_class()

use memset_startat() helper to simplify the code, there is no functional
change in this patch.

Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211213132618.105737-1-xiujianfeng@huawei.com

show more ...

lockdep: Remove softirq accounting on PREEMPT_RT.

There is not really a softirq context on PREEMPT_RT. Softirqs on
PREEMPT_RT are always invoked within the context of a threaded
interrupt handler o

lockdep: Remove softirq accounting on PREEMPT_RT.

There is not really a softirq context on PREEMPT_RT. Softirqs on
PREEMPT_RT are always invoked within the context of a threaded
interrupt handler or within ksoftirqd. The "in-softirq" context is
preemptible and is protected by a per-CPU lock to ensure mutual
exclusion.

There is no difference on PREEMPT_RT between spin_lock_irq() and
spin_lock() because the former does not disable interrupts. Therefore
if a lock is used in_softirq() and locked once with spin_lock_irq()
then lockdep will report this with "inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} ->
{IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage".

Teach lockdep that we don't really do softirqs on -RT.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129174654.668506-6-bigeasy@linutronix.de

show more ...

kallsyms: remove arch specific text and data check

Patch series "sections: Unify kernel sections range check and use", v4.

There are three head files(kallsyms.h, kernel.h and sections.h) which
incl

kallsyms: remove arch specific text and data check

Patch series "sections: Unify kernel sections range check and use", v4.

There are three head files(kallsyms.h, kernel.h and sections.h) which
include the kernel sections range check, let's make some cleanup and unify
them.

1. cleanup arch specific text/data check and fix address boundary check
in kallsyms.h

2. make all the basic/core kernel range check function into sections.h

3. update all the callers, and use the helper in sections.h to simplify
the code

After this series, we have 5 APIs about kernel sections range check in
sections.h

* is_kernel_rodata() --- already in sections.h
* is_kernel_core_data() --- come from core_kernel_data() in kernel.h
* is_kernel_inittext() --- come from kernel.h and kallsyms.h
* __is_kernel_text() --- add new internal helper
* __is_kernel() --- add new internal helper

Note: For the last two helpers, people should not use directly, consider to
use corresponding function in kallsyms.h.

This patch (of 11):

Remove arch specific text and data check after commit 4ba66a976072 ("arch:
remove blackfin port"), no need arch-specific text/data check.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210930071143.63410-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210930071143.63410-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

mm: make generic arch_is_kernel_initmem_freed() do what it says

Commit 7a5da02de8d6 ("locking/lockdep: check for freed initmem in
static_obj()") added arch_is_kernel_initmem_freed() which is suppose

mm: make generic arch_is_kernel_initmem_freed() do what it says

Commit 7a5da02de8d6 ("locking/lockdep: check for freed initmem in
static_obj()") added arch_is_kernel_initmem_freed() which is supposed to
report whether an object is part of already freed init memory.

For the time being, the generic version of
arch_is_kernel_initmem_freed() always reports 'false', allthough
free_initmem() is generically called on all architectures.

Therefore, change the generic version of arch_is_kernel_initmem_freed()
to check whether free_initmem() has been called. If so, then check if a
given address falls into init memory.

To ease the use of system_state, move it out of line into its only
caller which is lockdep.c

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1d40783e676e07858be97d881f449ee7ea8adfb1.1633001016.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...

lockdep: Improve comments in wait-type checks

Comments in wait-type checks be improved by mentioning the
PREEPT_RT kernel configure option.

Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>
Signed-

lockdep: Improve comments in wait-type checks

Comments in wait-type checks be improved by mentioning the
PREEPT_RT kernel configure option.

Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210811025920.20751-1-zhouzhouyi@gmail.com

show more ...

lockdep: Let lock_is_held_type() detect recursive read as read

lock_is_held_type(, 1) detects acquired read locks. It only recognized
locks acquired with lock_acquire_shared(). Read locks acquired w

lockdep: Let lock_is_held_type() detect recursive read as read

lock_is_held_type(, 1) detects acquired read locks. It only recognized
locks acquired with lock_acquire_shared(). Read locks acquired with
lock_acquire_shared_recursive() are not recognized because a `2' is
stored as the read value.

Rework the check to additionally recognise lock's read value one and two
as a read held lock.

Fixes: e918188611f07 ("locking: More accurate annotations for read_lock()")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210903084001.lblecrvz4esl4mrr@linutronix.de

show more ...

locking/lockdep: Avoid RCU-induced noinstr fail

vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: look_up_lock_class()+0xc7: call to rcu_read_lock_any_held() leaves .noinstr.text section

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (

locking/lockdep: Avoid RCU-induced noinstr fail

vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: look_up_lock_class()+0xc7: call to rcu_read_lock_any_held() leaves .noinstr.text section

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210624095148.311980536@infradead.org

show more ...

locking/lockdep: Correct the description error for check_redundant()

If there is no matched result, check_redundant() will return BFS_RNOMATCH.

Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@gmail.com>
Sign

locking/lockdep: Correct the description error for check_redundant()

If there is no matched result, check_redundant() will return BFS_RNOMATCH.

Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210618130230.123249-1-sxwjean@me.com

show more ...