Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:"4667 bebb" (Results 1 – 25 of 28) sorted by relevance

12

/openbsd/sys/sys/
H A Devcount.h4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/loongson/dev/
H A Dvoyager.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
H A Dbonito.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/dev/tc/
H A Dtcds.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/luna88k/dev/
H A Dtimekeeper.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/luna88k/luna88k/
H A Disr.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/landisk/landisk/
H A Dintr.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/alpha/tc/
H A Dioasic.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
H A Dtc_3000_300.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
H A Dtc_3000_500.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/kern/
H A Dsubr_evcount.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/sh/sh/
H A Dinterrupt.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/alpha/dev/
H A Dshared_intr.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/hppa/dev/
H A Dapic.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/i386/i386/
H A Dioapic.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/hppa/hppa/
H A Dintr.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/alpha/alpha/
H A Dclock.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/macppc/dev/
H A Dmacintr.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
H A Dopenpic.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/mips64/mips64/
H A Dclock.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
H A Dinterrupt.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/
H A Dintr.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/sparc64/sparc64/
H A Dintr.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/i386/isa/
H A Disa_machdep.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@
/openbsd/sys/arch/macppc/macppc/
H A Dclock.c4667bebb Mon Sep 20 06:33:46 GMT 2010 matthew <matthew@openbsd.org> Get rid of evcount's support for arranging counters in a tree
hierarchy. Everything attached to a single root node anyway, so at
best we had a bush.

"i think it is good" deraadt@

12