rbd: don't assume rbd_is_lock_owner() for exclusive mappings

Expanding on the previous commit, assuming that rbd_is_lock_owner()
always returns true (i.e. that we are either in RBD_LOCK_STATE_LOCKED

rbd: don't assume rbd_is_lock_owner() for exclusive mappings

Expanding on the previous commit, assuming that rbd_is_lock_owner()
always returns true (i.e. that we are either in RBD_LOCK_STATE_LOCKED
or RBD_LOCK_STATE_QUIESCING) if the mapping is exclusive is wrong too.
In case ceph_cls_set_cookie() fails, the lock would be temporarily
released even if the mapping is exclusive, meaning that we can end up
even in RBD_LOCK_STATE_UNLOCKED.

IOW, exclusive mappings are really "just" about disabling automatic
lock transitions (as documented in the man page), not about grabbing
the lock and holding on to it whatever it takes.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 637cd060537d ("rbd: new exclusive lock wait/wake code")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>

show more ...

rbd: don't assume RBD_LOCK_STATE_LOCKED for exclusive mappings

Every time a watch is reestablished after getting lost, we need to
update the cookie which involves quiescing exclusive lock. For this

rbd: don't assume RBD_LOCK_STATE_LOCKED for exclusive mappings

Every time a watch is reestablished after getting lost, we need to
update the cookie which involves quiescing exclusive lock. For this,
we transition from RBD_LOCK_STATE_LOCKED to RBD_LOCK_STATE_QUIESCING
roughly for the duration of rbd_reacquire_lock() call. If the mapping
is exclusive and I/O happens to arrive in this time window, it's failed
with EROFS (later translated to EIO) based on the wrong assumption in
rbd_img_exclusive_lock() -- "lock got released?" check there stopped
making sense with commit a2b1da09793d ("rbd: lock should be quiesced on
reacquire").

To make it worse, any such I/O is added to the acquiring list before
EROFS is returned and this sets up for violating rbd_lock_del_request()
precondition that the request is either on the running list or not on
any list at all -- see commit ded080c86b3f ("rbd: don't move requests
to the running list on errors"). rbd_lock_del_request() ends up
processing these requests as if they were on the running list which
screws up quiescing_wait completion counter and ultimately leads to

rbd_assert(!completion_done(&rbd_dev->quiescing_wait));

being triggered on the next watch error.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 06ef84c4e9c4: rbd: rename RBD_LOCK_STATE_RELEASING and releasing_wait
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 637cd060537d ("rbd: new exclusive lock wait/wake code")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>

show more ...

rbd: rename RBD_LOCK_STATE_RELEASING and releasing_wait

... to RBD_LOCK_STATE_QUIESCING and quiescing_wait to recognize that
this state and the associated completion are backing rbd_quiesce_lock(),

rbd: rename RBD_LOCK_STATE_RELEASING and releasing_wait

... to RBD_LOCK_STATE_QUIESCING and quiescing_wait to recognize that
this state and the associated completion are backing rbd_quiesce_lock(),
which isn't specific to releasing the lock.

While exclusive lock does get quiesced before it's released, it also
gets quiesced before an attempt to update the cookie is made and there
the lock is not released as long as ceph_cls_set_cookie() succeeds.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>

show more ...

block: move the stable_writes flag to queue_limits

Move the stable_writes flag into the queue_limits feature field so that
it can be set atomically with the queue frozen.

The flag is now inherited

block: move the stable_writes flag to queue_limits

Move the stable_writes flag into the queue_limits feature field so that
it can be set atomically with the queue frozen.

The flag is now inherited by blk_stack_limits, which greatly simplifies
the code in dm, and fixed md which previously did not pass on the flag
set on lower devices.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240617060532.127975-18-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block: move the nonrot flag to queue_limits

Move the nonrot flag into the queue_limits feature field so that it can
be set atomically with the queue frozen.

Use the chance to switch to defaulting t

block: move the nonrot flag to queue_limits

Move the nonrot flag into the queue_limits feature field so that it can
be set atomically with the queue frozen.

Use the chance to switch to defaulting to non-rotational and require
the driver to opt into rotational, which matches the polarity of the
sysfs interface.

For the z2ram, ps3vram, 2x memstick, ubiblock and dcssblk the new
rotational flag is not set as they clearly are not rotational despite
this being a behavior change. There are some other drivers that
unconditionally set the rotational flag to keep the existing behavior
as they arguably can be used on rotational devices even if that is
probably not their main use today (e.g. virtio_blk and drbd).

The flag is automatically inherited in blk_stack_limits matching the
existing behavior in dm and md.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240617060532.127975-15-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block: take io_opt and io_min into account for max_sectors

The soft max_sectors limit is normally capped by the hardware limits and
an arbitrary upper limit enforced by the kernel, but can be modifi

block: take io_opt and io_min into account for max_sectors

The soft max_sectors limit is normally capped by the hardware limits and
an arbitrary upper limit enforced by the kernel, but can be modified by
the user. A few drivers want to increase this limit (nbd, rbd) or
adjust it up or down based on hardware capabilities (sd).

Change blk_validate_limits to default max_sectors to the optimal I/O
size, or upgrade it to the preferred minimal I/O size if that is
larger than the kernel default if no optimal I/O size is provided based
on the logic in the SD driver.

This keeps the existing kernel default for drivers that do not provide
an io_opt or very big io_min value, but picks a much more useful
default for those who provide these hints, and allows to remove the
hacks to set the user max_sectors limit in nbd, rbd and sd.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240531074837.1648501-5-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

rbd: increase io_opt again

Commit 16d80c54ad42 ("rbd: set io_min, io_opt and discard_granularity to
alloc_size") lowered the io_opt size for rbd from objset_bytes which is
4MB for typical setup to a

rbd: increase io_opt again

Commit 16d80c54ad42 ("rbd: set io_min, io_opt and discard_granularity to
alloc_size") lowered the io_opt size for rbd from objset_bytes which is
4MB for typical setup to alloc_size which is typically 64KB.

The commit mostly talks about discard behavior and does mention io_min
in passing. Reducing io_opt means reducing the readahead size, which
seems counter-intuitive given that rbd currently abuses the user
max_sectors setting to actually increase the I/O size. Switch back
to the old setting to allow larger reads (the readahead size despite it's
name actually limits the size of any buffered read) and to prepare
for using io_opt in the max_sectors calculation and getting drivers out
of the business of overriding the max_user_sectors value.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240531074837.1648501-4-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

rbd: pass queue_limits to blk_mq_alloc_disk

Pass the limits rbd imposes directly to blk_mq_alloc_disk instead
of setting them one at a time.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: http

rbd: pass queue_limits to blk_mq_alloc_disk

Pass the limits rbd imposes directly to blk_mq_alloc_disk instead
of setting them one at a time.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240215070300.2200308-8-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block: pass a queue_limits argument to blk_mq_alloc_disk

Pass a queue_limits to blk_mq_alloc_disk and apply it if non-NULL. This
will allow allocating queues with valid queue limits instead of sett

block: pass a queue_limits argument to blk_mq_alloc_disk

Pass a queue_limits to blk_mq_alloc_disk and apply it if non-NULL. This
will allow allocating queues with valid queue limits instead of setting
the values one at a time later.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213073425.1621680-11-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block: rbd: make rbd_bus_type const

Now that the driver core can properly handle constant struct bus_type,
move the rbd_bus_type variable to be a constant structure as well,
placing it into read-onl

block: rbd: make rbd_bus_type const

Now that the driver core can properly handle constant struct bus_type,
move the rbd_bus_type variable to be a constant structure as well,
placing it into read-only memory which can not be modified at runtime.

Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo B. Marliere <ricardo@marliere.net>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240204-bus_cleanup-block-v1-1-fc77afd8d7cc@marliere.net
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

rbd: don't move requests to the running list on errors

The running list is supposed to contain requests that are pinning the
exclusive lock, i.e. those that must be flushed before exclusive lock
is

rbd: don't move requests to the running list on errors

The running list is supposed to contain requests that are pinning the
exclusive lock, i.e. those that must be flushed before exclusive lock
is released. When wake_lock_waiters() is called to handle an error,
requests on the acquiring list are failed with that error and no
flushing takes place. Briefly moving them to the running list is not
only pointless but also harmful: if exclusive lock gets acquired
before all of their state machines are scheduled and go through
rbd_lock_del_request(), we trigger

rbd_assert(list_empty(&rbd_dev->running_list));

in rbd_try_acquire_lock().

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 637cd060537d ("rbd: new exclusive lock wait/wake code")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>

show more ...

rbd: remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_*() API

ida_alloc() and ida_free() should be preferred to the deprecated
ida_simple_get() and ida_simple_remove().

Note that the upper limit of ida_si

rbd: remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_*() API

ida_alloc() and ida_free() should be preferred to the deprecated
ida_simple_get() and ida_simple_remove().

Note that the upper limit of ida_simple_get() is exclusive, while that
of ida_alloc_max() is inclusive, so 1 has been subtracted.

[ idryomov: tweak changelog ]

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>

show more ...

rbd: take header_rwsem in rbd_dev_refresh() only when updating

rbd_dev_refresh() has been holding header_rwsem across header and
parent info read-in unnecessarily for ages. With commit 870611e4877e

rbd: take header_rwsem in rbd_dev_refresh() only when updating

rbd_dev_refresh() has been holding header_rwsem across header and
parent info read-in unnecessarily for ages. With commit 870611e4877e
("rbd: get snapshot context after exclusive lock is ensured to be
held"), the potential for deadlocks became much more real owning to
a) header_rwsem now nesting inside lock_rwsem and b) rw_semaphores
not allowing new readers after a writer is registered.

For example, assuming that I/O request 1, I/O request 2 and header
read-in request all target the same OSD:

1. I/O request 1 comes in and gets submitted
2. watch error occurs
3. rbd_watch_errcb() takes lock_rwsem for write, clears owner_cid and
releases lock_rwsem
4. after reestablishing the watch, rbd_reregister_watch() calls
rbd_dev_refresh() which takes header_rwsem for write and submits
a header read-in request
5. I/O request 2 comes in: after taking lock_rwsem for read in
__rbd_img_handle_request(), it blocks trying to take header_rwsem
for read in rbd_img_object_requests()
6. another watch error occurs
7. rbd_watch_errcb() blocks trying to take lock_rwsem for write
8. I/O request 1 completion is received by the messenger but can't be
processed because lock_rwsem won't be granted anymore
9. header read-in request completion can't be received, let alone
processed, because the messenger is stranded

Change rbd_dev_refresh() to take header_rwsem only for actually
updating rbd_dev->header. Header and parent info read-in don't need
any locking.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 0b035401c570: rbd: move rbd_dev_refresh() definition
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 510a7330c82a: rbd: decouple header read-in from updating rbd_dev->header
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # c10311776f0a: rbd: decouple parent info read-in from updating rbd_dev
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 870611e4877e ("rbd: get snapshot context after exclusive lock is ensured to be held")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>

show more ...

rbd: decouple parent info read-in from updating rbd_dev

Unlike header read-in, parent info read-in is already decoupled in
get_parent_info(), but it's buried in rbd_dev_v2_parent_info() along
with t

rbd: decouple parent info read-in from updating rbd_dev

Unlike header read-in, parent info read-in is already decoupled in
get_parent_info(), but it's buried in rbd_dev_v2_parent_info() along
with the processing logic.

Separate the initial read-in and update read-in logic into
rbd_dev_setup_parent() and rbd_dev_update_parent() respectively and
have rbd_dev_v2_parent_info() just populate struct parent_image_info
(i.e. what get_parent_info() did). Some existing QoI issues, like
flatten of a standalone clone being disregarded on refresh, remain.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>

show more ...

rbd: decouple header read-in from updating rbd_dev->header

Make rbd_dev_header_info() populate a passed struct rbd_image_header
instead of rbd_dev->header and introduce rbd_dev_update_header() for
u

rbd: decouple header read-in from updating rbd_dev->header

Make rbd_dev_header_info() populate a passed struct rbd_image_header
instead of rbd_dev->header and introduce rbd_dev_update_header() for
updating mutable fields in rbd_dev->header upon refresh. The initial
read-in of both mutable and immutable fields in rbd_dev_image_probe()
passes in rbd_dev->header so no update step is required there.

rbd_init_layout() is now called directly from rbd_dev_image_probe()
instead of individually in format 1 and format 2 implementations.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>

show more ...

rbd: move rbd_dev_refresh() definition

Move rbd_dev_refresh() definition further down to avoid having to
move struct parent_image_info definition in the next commit. This
spares some forward declar

rbd: move rbd_dev_refresh() definition

Move rbd_dev_refresh() definition further down to avoid having to
move struct parent_image_info definition in the next commit. This
spares some forward declarations too.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>

show more ...

rbd: use list_for_each_entry() helper

Convert list_for_each() to list_for_each_entry() so that the tmp
list_head pointer and list_entry() call are no longer needed, which
can reduce a few lines of c

rbd: use list_for_each_entry() helper

Convert list_for_each() to list_for_each_entry() so that the tmp
list_head pointer and list_entry() call are no longer needed, which
can reduce a few lines of code. No functional changed.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>

show more ...

rbd: prevent busy loop when requesting exclusive lock

Due to rbd_try_acquire_lock() effectively swallowing all but
EBLOCKLISTED error from rbd_try_lock() ("request lock anyway") and
rbd_request_lock

rbd: prevent busy loop when requesting exclusive lock

Due to rbd_try_acquire_lock() effectively swallowing all but
EBLOCKLISTED error from rbd_try_lock() ("request lock anyway") and
rbd_request_lock() returning ETIMEDOUT error not only for an actual
notify timeout but also when the lock owner doesn't respond, a busy
loop inside of rbd_acquire_lock() between rbd_try_acquire_lock() and
rbd_request_lock() is possible.

Requesting the lock on EBUSY error (returned by get_lock_owner_info()
if an incompatible lock or invalid lock owner is detected) makes very
little sense. The same goes for ETIMEDOUT error (might pop up pretty
much anywhere if osd_request_timeout option is set) and many others.

Just fail I/O requests on rbd_dev->acquiring_list immediately on any
error from rbd_try_lock().

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 588159009d5b: rbd: retrieve and check lock owner twice before blocklisting
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>

show more ...

rbd: retrieve and check lock owner twice before blocklisting

An attempt to acquire exclusive lock can race with the current lock
owner closing the image:

1. lock is held by client123, rbd_lock() re

rbd: retrieve and check lock owner twice before blocklisting

An attempt to acquire exclusive lock can race with the current lock
owner closing the image:

1. lock is held by client123, rbd_lock() returns -EBUSY
2. get_lock_owner_info() returns client123 instance details
3. client123 closes the image, lock is released
4. find_watcher() returns 0 as there is no matching watcher anymore
5. client123 instance gets erroneously blocklisted

Particularly impacted is mirror snapshot scheduler in snapshot-based
mirroring since it happens to open and close images a lot (images are
opened only for as long as it takes to take the next mirror snapshot,
the same client instance is used for all images).

To reduce the potential for erroneous blocklisting, retrieve the lock
owner again after find_watcher() returns 0. If it's still there, make
sure it matches the previously detected lock owner.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # f38cb9d9c204: rbd: make get_lock_owner_info() return a single locker or NULL
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 8ff2c64c9765: rbd: harden get_lock_owner_info() a bit
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>

show more ...

rbd: harden get_lock_owner_info() a bit

- we want the exclusive lock type, so test for it directly
- use sscanf() to actually parse the lock cookie and avoid admitting
invalid handles
- bail if lo

rbd: harden get_lock_owner_info() a bit

- we want the exclusive lock type, so test for it directly
- use sscanf() to actually parse the lock cookie and avoid admitting
invalid handles
- bail if locker has a blank address

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>

show more ...

rbd: make get_lock_owner_info() return a single locker or NULL

Make the "num_lockers can be only 0 or 1" assumption explicit and
simplify the API by getting rid of output parameters in preparation
f

rbd: make get_lock_owner_info() return a single locker or NULL

Make the "num_lockers can be only 0 or 1" assumption explicit and
simplify the API by getting rid of output parameters in preparation
for calling get_lock_owner_info() twice before blocklisting.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>

show more ...

block: replace fmode_t with a block-specific type for block open flags

The only overlap between the block open flags mapped into the fmode_t and
other uses of fmode_t are FMODE_READ and FMODE_WRITE.

block: replace fmode_t with a block-specific type for block open flags

The only overlap between the block open flags mapped into the fmode_t and
other uses of fmode_t are FMODE_READ and FMODE_WRITE. Define a new
blk_mode_t instead for use in blkdev_get_by_{dev,path}, ->open and
->ioctl and stop abusing fmode_t.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com> [rnbd]
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230608110258.189493-28-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block: remove the unused mode argument to ->release

The mode argument to the ->release block_device_operation is never used,
so remove it.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by:

block: remove the unused mode argument to ->release

The mode argument to the ->release block_device_operation is never used,
so remove it.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com> [rnbd]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230608110258.189493-10-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

block: pass a gendisk to ->open

->open is only called on the whole device. Make that explicit by
passing a gendisk instead of the block_device.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Review

block: pass a gendisk to ->open

->open is only called on the whole device. Make that explicit by
passing a gendisk instead of the block_device.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com> [rnbd]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230608110258.189493-9-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

show more ...

rbd: get snapshot context after exclusive lock is ensured to be held

Move capturing the snapshot context into the image request state
machine, after exclusive lock is ensured to be held for the dura

rbd: get snapshot context after exclusive lock is ensured to be held

Move capturing the snapshot context into the image request state
machine, after exclusive lock is ensured to be held for the duration of
dealing with the image request. This is needed to ensure correctness
of fast-diff states (OBJECT_EXISTS vs OBJECT_EXISTS_CLEAN) and object
deltas computed based off of them. Otherwise the object map that is
forked for the snapshot isn't guaranteed to accurately reflect the
contents of the snapshot when the snapshot is taken under I/O. This
breaks differential backup and snapshot-based mirroring use cases with
fast-diff enabled: since some object deltas may be incomplete, the
destination image may get corrupted.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/61472
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>

show more ...